The case in Turin

Man acquitted after assault on 13-year-old; following Meloni’s outburst, the ANM responds: ‘Unsubstantiated attacks’

Just two nights in prison for a convenience shop owner; the investigating magistrate releases him on condition that he reports regularly to the authorities, and Nordio sends in inspectors. Magistrates on the front line

 Adobe Stock

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The case is shocking and has provoked a strong reaction from the Government, with the Minister for Justice Carlo Nordio sending in inspectors and the Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni once again attacking the rulings of magistrates who, in her view, are hindering public safety: A 42-year-old man from Bangladesh sexually assaulted a 13-year-old girl in his convenience shop in Madonna di Campagna, on the far northern outskirts of Turin. He was arrested and then released by the investigating magistrate after just two nights in custody because ‘he proved cooperative’.

The day after the barrage of criticism, however, the National Magistrates’ Association issued a response, with its president Giuseppe Tango strongly condemning the ‘various unrestrained attacks by senior government figures, which have gone beyond mere criticism’ of the order. It also branded the deployment of inspectors as ‘unorthodox’.

Loading...

Abuses captured on CCTV

The news, which broke in the press on the morning of 1 September, is doing the rounds on social media, sparking widespread anger and dismay. This is partly because the assault – reported by the 13-year-old girl, who immediately phoned her mother and waited on the pavement for a friend to arrive – was captured on CCTV, which had even recorded another assault, against an adult woman, committed by the same man just 40 minutes earlier.

According to the investigating judge, the man ‘showed remorse’

Yet, after just two nights in a cell at Lorusso e Cutugno prison and against the public prosecutor’s advice, the arrest was not upheld and the shopkeeper was released. The investigating magistrate ruled that the man had ‘shown remorse’; he had handed over the shop’s CCTV footage to the police himself and, during the validation hearing, had expressed ‘regret’, whilst exercising his right to remain silent. Furthermore, in the judge’s view, the ‘trauma of the arrest’ could serve as a sufficient deterrent.

The protests

The wave of outrage cuts across all sections of society: women, first and foremost, are protesting against the judge’s blatant (and, sadly, all too frequent) downplaying of the violence and the risk of reoffending. Outside Turin police headquarters, a demonstration is taking place under the slogan ‘Let’s close the paedophile market’, organised by representatives of Fdi, led by the deputy group leader in the Chamber of Deputies, Augusta Montaruli, and the vice-president of the Piedmont Region, Maurizio Marrone, who denounce as ‘unacceptable’ the fact that the man can return to work as if nothing had happened. PD MPs on the Femicide Committee describe it as a ‘very serious case’. The M5S promises to table a parliamentary question.

Nordio’s move

Nordio has decided to send inspectors to the Turin court to carry out investigations, earning the praise of the League’s Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini , who took the opportunity to revive the proposal for chemical castration. “I note that the investigating judge’s decision falls within the scope of the judiciary’s autonomy and independence, in which I cannot and must not interfere,” clarifies Nordio. “Nevertheless, given the exceptional nature of the case and the public alarm it has caused, I have ordered inspectors to be sent to gather all relevant information.” The other Deputy Prime Minister, Antonio Tajani of the Centre-Right Alliance, speaks of an “offence against all Italian women”.

Meloni: ruling ‘breaks the virtuous cycle’

But it is Meloni who gives voice to this bitterness in a long Facebook post. “The judge’s reasoning is: he had no previous convictions, he cooperated, and he said he was sorry. Sorry,” explains the Prime Minister. “We talk, quite rightly, a great deal about security. The Government is, quite rightly, being held to account for what is going wrong. But here, we must ask the question to its very end. We have drafted the laws, and they are stricter than ever. The police did their duty, within a few hours, and did it very well. The Public Prosecutor’s Office requested the harshest possible sentence. The whole system worked. And then a ruling comes along that overturns it in forty-eight hours, and we can do nothing about it, except send inspectors from the Ministry, which is what we are doing.”

‘Moving forward on security, but it’s difficult this way’

Meloni has reiterated the regret she had already expressed at the press conference at the start of the year, when she criticised the magistrates for undoing the work of Parliament and the police. “Who is going to explain this to that family? Who is going to explain this to that neighbourhood, which now knows that that man is back there again? We will carry on. Laws, personnel, equipment, resources. Right to the very end. But it really is difficult this way. My complete solidarity goes out to the young woman and her family.”

In Defence of Judges

On 2 September, the judiciary responded with a statement from President Tango, which began by setting out the facts of the case (‘A magistrate – the deputy public prosecutor in Turin – faced with a heinous sexual offence, namely the groping of a 13-year-old girl, requested imprisonment for a man accused of committing the offence. Another magistrate, the judge for preliminary investigations, instead ordered a different precautionary measure, namely the obligation to sign in at the police station’), emphasising that the measure ‘can obviously be criticised, but above all it can be challenged in accordance with the procedural rules themselves, by appealing to the Review Court and, if necessary, to the Court of Cassation’.

Sending inspectors is an ‘unorthodox move’

In short, Tango continues, “it is not a final decision. Nor is it a judgement; indeed, it is neither a conviction nor an acquittal.” Against this backdrop – and this is the crux of the matter – “there have been several unrestrained attacks by influential government figures, which have gone beyond mere criticism. And this is what we strongly condemn, just as we consider the deployment of inspectors – whose role is not to assess the merits of individual proceedings – to be entirely unorthodox’.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti