Editorials

"65 years of Ilva with the ovens off: who turned off the industry?"

Italian domestic consumption of flat-rolled products remains around 15 million tonnes; in 2023 we had to import more than 11 million tonnes

by Marco Bentivogli

(Imagoeocnomica)

3' min read

3' min read

The sustainability of industry in our country is approached like an apple grower who, in order to pick them, cuts off the branch - if not the entire trunk. Just yesterday the Taranto plant turned 65 years old, of which only twenty were in private hands; for more than two-thirds of its history it was run by the state through Italsider or various extraordinary administrations. It is the first anniversary with all the blast furnaces switched off (Afo4 will be back in operation tomorrow).

Two ways to produce steel. There are only two processes: (1) blast furnace-converter integral cycle and (2) electric furnace (Eaf). In Italy, the only integral cycle steel mill is Taranto. This type of flat-rolled production is indispensable for cars, electrical appliances and construction. In Northern Italy, steel plants use the electric furnace melting process.

Loading...

Italian domestic consumption of flat-rolled products remains around 15 million tonnes; in 2023 we had to import more than 11 million tonnes. During the long crisis at Ilva (now Acciaierie d'Italia), the production of flat-rolled products plummeted from 9.3 million tonnes per year in 2011 2012 - the hot-rolled area was placed under seizure on 26 July 2012 - to 4.5 million in 2019, to reach around 2 million in 2024. That collapse was paid for twice: with 'bridge loans' paid for by taxpayers and with the trade balance, weighed down by imports of the steel we once produced. The market spaces left by Ilva were occupied by northern European competitors and, above all, by the Chinese, Turks and Indians. Already in 2023, Italy was the first EU destination of Chinese steel, with 3.8 million tonnes (over a third of the EU total).

The pinwheel of failed solutions. In January 2024, the government chose extraordinary administration again, promising lightning procedures. On 20 March, the commissioners received a mandate to negotiate exclusively with the Azerbaijani consortium Baku Steel + Azerbaijan Investment Company, for a total offer of around one billion. But on 7 May, a fire at Blast Furnace 1, which was already scheduled to be extinguished and replaced with an electric furnace, led to the plant being seized 'without authority'. This further reduced production capacity and increased the cost of the refurbishment. A few days later, it leaked from Palazzo Chigi that Baku Steel was asking to halve the price, reopening the siren song of total nationalisation.

Since June, it has been back to the Italian routine: stalemate, political raises, buyers' downgrades and the risk of negotiations breaking down. In our 'war on multinationals', the politicians continue to indemnify their escape with public money: on 12 June, a further 200 million in bridging liquidity was allocated. Total loans now exceed one billion. Beyond the labels, the question is whether the government and local authorities should write the business plan or limit themselves to setting objectives - sustainability, employment, industrial redevelopment - leaving the route to the operators.

Decarbonise for real or just proclaim? For years, there has been talk of abandoning the integral cycle and installing three electric furnaces fuelled by direct reduced iron (Dri). Dri, obtained by reducing ore with natural gas, cuts the use of coke and CO₂ emissions, used in electric furnaces requires less energy, making the process more efficient. But calling an electric furnace 'green' is a gamble if the energy comes from liquefied natural gas or fossil-generated electricity. And producing Dri without a regasifier is a paradox.

In perspective - a long one - 'zero-emission' steel passes through green hydrogen (today very expensive) or 'circular' hydrogen obtained from non-recyclable plastic: technologies on which some Italian companies hold patents. However, time, investment and clear choices are needed. Government plans indicate seven to eight years for decarbonisation. And in the meantime? One day we will write the chronicle of the responsibilities of those who have wasted time from 2012 to 2018 and from 2018 to today.

A tug-of-war of demagogy. The Ilva dispute remains stuck in the eternal clash between local authorities, the company and the government and state powers. The Aia - with its conference of services and programme agreement - demands a real confrontation with the territory, but also asks all levels of government to take their share of responsibility. But it would be a radical change of step that is not on the horizon after having trained politics to slogans and penultimatums that are even more grotesque with time running out.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti