The 80th anniversary of the Republic: the turning point and new rights
The Constitution. From the health law to the education law, from the full recognition of the strike to the role of political parties and the women's vote: here is how Italia changed
2 June 1946 is not just the day of the choice between monarchy and republic. It is the day on which the people really enter into the constitutional life of the country and, with their vote for the Constituent Assembly, entrust the new mass parties with the fundamental decisions on the destiny of the nation.
The Constitution is the child of that vote. And the new rights it introduces mark the transition from the liberal to the democratic state, where the Republic has the task of 'removing economic and social obstacles' that effectively limit freedom and participation.
Five rights, more than others, tell of this turning point.
The first is the right to health. In liberal Italia, health was essentially an individual or public health problem. Article 32 radically changes the paradigm and qualifies it as a 'fundamental right of the individual and interest of the community'. A novel formula, which considers the effective protection of health as one of the highest functions of the Republic and, at the same time, conceives it as a right of freedom, intimately connected to the value of the dignity of the person and his right to self-determination. A conception that was perhaps too advanced for the culture of the time, so much so that it would not be fully implemented until thirty years later, with the National Health Service of 1978. And even today that constitutional promise remains fragile, amidst the welfare crisis and resistance to recognising the individual's right to decide for himself (albeit not shared by all), especially with regard to life and death.
The second is education and public schools. Articles 33 and 34 design an inclusive, pluralist school, open to all, 'even those without means'. And in that formula is perhaps the Republic's most ambitious promise: to use schooling to give everyone the chance, as Sciascia put it, to reason and, in this way, reduce the inequalities at the start. Here too, however, the distance between proclamation and implementation remains evident. School dispersion, territorial disparities and impoverishment of the public system show a promise that is still largely unfulfilled.



