Sensory books

A dreamlike journey into the world of touch. The most intimate and secret sense

Touch to believe? No, touch to live. It is not a paradox: the skin is an extension of the brain. A book to give as a gift and put under the tree.

by Letizia Muratori

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Deprived of tactile experience, our vital functions shut down. Think of infants, who need not only food, protection and care in order to grow into healthy, happy adults, but also care made up of physical presence, caresses and epidermal contact. This is just one example among many recounted in the fine essay that Marta Paterlini, neurobiologist and science journalist, has dedicated to the subject: La pelle che pensa (Codice Edizioni, 2025).

The title alone is enough to arouse curiosity: a clever lure that, this is the point, delivers on its promises. We are faced with a rigorous, compelling and truly multidisciplinary investigation into history, literature, philosophy, biology and social taboos. We start from the origins, from the Homeric myth that bestowed on touch a revelatory and life-giving power, and arrive at recent neurobiological research. The Thinking Skin is an adventurous journey in which Paterlini never loses his bearings and leads us, it has to be said, by the hand through the twists and turns of this story that is sensitive from every point of view.

Loading...

As chance would have it, I have long been writing a story in which touch is at the centre of the action and reveals the characters. Much more important: my father is a retired internist. Let us start with him. Dad complains that today's doctors touch patients the bare minimum, sometimes never. He says: "They don't visit any more". It happens that he grabs his leather bag and runs to palpate the abdomen of an acquaintance for a second opinion. Until a few years ago, Dr Muratori's idea of touch in medical practice was essentially diagnostic; the man is eighty-one years old and comes from a school of hospital clinicians devoted to constant and meticulous observation of the sick bed, but a forthcoming and very painful experience has led him to reconsider the therapeutic aspect of touch as well. A caress is valuable in itself, touching heals, not only emotionally, the skin is not an inert mat, as it feels, it thinks. In short, it is an extension of the brain. So tactile communication is a language that allows us to know and help the other, but above all ourselves. Let's try never touching each other's face, one day, and we will understand how sight, hearing, smell, are not enough. Self-perception is provided by touch. And proprioception, i.e. knowing where we are without resorting to sight, has to do with balance, and survival. The boxer's first requirement in the ring is not strength, endurance, elasticity, but constant awareness of his position. Boxing matches are shows of proprioception.

During the isolation regime imposed on us by the Covid pandemic, what did we miss? On our devices we saw others, we listened to them, that sense of alienation we had never felt before came from the absence of contact, a physical and soul distancing. I do not have the competence to assess, except on an empirical and personal level, the repercussions that isolation has had on young people, on children, overwhelmed by the health emergency at a crucial time of growth and education for them, but I trust that those reading this know what we are talking about. By the way, there are thousands of studies, of articles, dedicated to the issue. There is literature, as they say.

We have experienced the discomfort caused by the lack of contact and at the same time today we cannot afford to touch anyone without consent. We have, rightly, claimed the right to establish boundaries between ourselves and others. Boundaries that must not become a prison, however, and the discourse would be long. Equally complex is to summarise the perceptual evolution in the age of the virtual. Which is real, because it exists. Finally, the issue of safety and prevention, corroborated by the unstoppable development of technology, raises further questions about the fate of, say, a hug. I repeat, it is not 'only' about finding emotional shelter, nor is it 'only' about empathy, by hugging someone, by touching something, we initiate cognitive pathways. Children touch everything to get an idea of the world, of themselves in relation to the world. Touch is a powerful antidote to fear.

Il libro “La pelle che pensa”, di Marta Paterlini, Codice Edizioni (22 €).

What does it mean to feel alive? A question that troubles touch, perhaps before all the other senses. The philosopher Daniel Heller-Roazen has answered it by elaborating the archaeology of a single sense: 'That inner touch by which we perceive ourselves' (The Inner Touch, Quodlibet, 2020).

Giorgio Agamben, commenting on Roazen's work, traces therein a problem that philosophers and scientists cannot help but wonder about in the future: "What is the sense with which, on this side or beyond consciousness, we feel we exist?" So sensation and feeling of self are defined through touch, internal. Self-perception obviously does not exclude sight, hearing, smell, but internally it is touch that ascertains and reveals existence to the existent, because it implies proximity, closeness.

A long time ago I happened to help an elderly lady use the touchscreen of her mobile phone, like many of her generation she couldn't find the right touch, didn't adjust and made a mess. I remember saying to her: "It's not glowing, be brave, like this". And she: "Easy, what are you doing!" And I: "Do what?" On the screen was a photograph of her baby son and I realised that it bothered her to leave footprints on it, even hers.

I conclude with a synaesthetic provocation that intertwines the senses. I came across it while reading an essay by the philosopher of language Marco Mazzeo. Towards the end of the 17th century, the Irish thinker and scientist William Molyneux posed a thorny question to his illustrious colleague John Locke: if one day a blind man were to regain his sight, would he be able to recognise with his eyes two objects, such as a cube or a sphere, which he had hitherto perceived by touch?

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...
Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti