Art and Finance

A market changing its skin and looking towards more sustainable sales

There is a significant decrease in works above ten million and an increase in those below $50,000

3' min read

3' min read

Art does not end with market graphs. It does not coincide with percentage fluctuations or records being broken in the auction room. Art survives economic cycles because it belongs to a broader dimension: that of culture, collective memory and shared experience. Precisely for this reason, the cooling down that the market is going through today should not be read as an irreversible decline, but as a phase transition.

Artnet's Mid-Year Intelligence Report 2025 records an 8.8% drop in fine art auction sales in the first half of the year, with the average price per lot falling by 6.5%, to its lowest level in the last decade. The collapse in transactions above ten million dollars was dramatic: -43.4%, with only 27 lots sold, an all-time low. It is the epilogue of a season in which the ultra-contemporary segment had exploded, now down 31.3%.

Loading...

This is not an isolated episode. Already the Global Art Market Report 2025 by Art Basel and Ubs had highlighted a structural cooling of the top end: works above ten million were down 39% in 2024, after a -27% drop in 2023. Yet, while the spotlight shone on the collapse of stellar sales, elsewhere new dynamics were emerging: according to "The Art Newspaper", sales of works below $50,000 grew by 20%. Collectors have not abandoned the field; they have simply chosen more sustainable ground.

The market, therefore, is not in agony: it is changing its skin. The first to retreat are the speculators, burnt out by a model that turned young artists into fast-consuming assets. In contrast, more solid segments are growing: Old Masters (+24.4%) and the $1-10 million bracket (+13.8%), which now seems to be the new centre of gravity. Not the end of the market, but the end of a euphoric cycle.

Robert Jensen guessed it (2023, 'Journal of Cultural Economics'): the art market goes through cycles of expansion, contraction and realignment. But what makes the current transition unique is the extreme financialisation. Not surprisingly, the "Financial Times" reported the first margin calls on loans secured by works: when values fall, collateral falters, and art reveals how much it has been treated like a stock.

In this context, the words of Marc Spiegler, former global director of Art Basel, take on particular weight. In a recent article for "Business of Fashion", Spiegler warned that "the moment you position art as an asset, you kill what makes it valuable in the long run". Financialisation, he adds, is 'threefold dangerous': it generates financial losses, it shifts galleries towards speculators instead of long-term collectors and it distracts those who enter the art world for cultural reasons from its deeper meaning.

It is not a question of rejecting the idea that art can also have an economic value. It would be naive to deny that today works and collections can be used as collateral for credit, or that younger collectors - 83% under 35, according to Deloitte - see art as an alternative asset. The real challenge is not to reduce art to this. The point is not to eliminate the financial dimension, but to place it within cultural and institutional infrastructures that limit its volatility and preserve its meaning.

It is therefore not a sterile contraposition between those who claim art as a pure cultural good and those who see it as an asset class. This dichotomy benefits no one, because it raises walls and produces divisions. Art is both: an irreplaceable aesthetic and community experience, but also a market that needs reading tools, transparent indicators and systems capable of guiding operators and collectors in a complex context.

The future of the sector is not played out between black and white, but in rebalancing. A market that is less obsessed with finance and more attentive to cultural resilience is not a poorer market, but a more mature market. Today the task is clear: not to chase the umpteenth record, but to restore depth to the gaze. Not just counting lots, but measuring cultural impact. Not to idolise euphoria, but to learn from its decline.

Bocconi University

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti