Asylum seekers

Albania, Rome court refers migrants to EU court and suspends detention: they will return to Italy

Even for the seven who arrived on board the Libra ship on Friday, the Roman judges did not validate their stay in the Gjader centre. The Viminale will appear before the judges in Luxembourg

by Manuela Perrone

Migranti camminano nel porto di Shengjin, accanto alle forze di sicurezza italiane, dopo essere sbarcati dalla nave Libra della Marina Militare - AP Photo/Vlasov Sulaj)

6' min read

6' min read

Second flop. The immigration section of the civil court of Rome suspended the validation of the detentions in the Albanian centre of Gjader of the seven migrants - two from Egypt and three from Bangladesh - who had arrived in Albania on board the ship Libra on Friday morning. The eighth, an Egyptian, had been immediately sent back to Italy after health screening in the Schengjin hotspot.

Treatments suspended pending the EU Court

.

The order to be validated was issued by the Rome Police Headquarters. But the court, repeating in substance the first decision of mid-October with which it gave the red light to the detention of the first 12 migrants in Gjader (four others had immediately returned to Brindisi because they were minors or ill), has once again called a halt, this time waiting for the European Court of Justice to rule on four questions and in general on the validity, under EU law, of the list of safe countries drawn up by Italy, a question already raised in recent days by the tribunal of Bologna. The Catania court, on the other hand, went further, directly disapplying the Law Decree because it was considered incompatible with EU law.

Loading...

Following 48 hours, migrants return to Italy

.

"Due to the preliminary reference, the judges did not rule on the requests for validation," reads a note from the court, "but necessarily had to suspend the relevant judgments pending the decision of the Court of Justice. The suspension of the judgments does not stop the passage of the legal term of forty-eight hours for the effectiveness of the detentions ordered by the police". Once the 48 hours have expired, the seven migrants will be taken to the Coast Guard ship Visalli in Brindisi, which they will reach during the night, and will be transferred to a centre for asylum seekers on Apulian territory to undergo the ordinary process of examining their applications for international protection.

Vain the armouring of the list of safe countries by decree law

The decision is bound to exacerbate the clash between the Meloni government and the judiciary. Also because the order came after the approval of the list of safe countries - those where the accelerated procedures at the border can be applied - by decree-law (before, it was stable by inter-ministerial decree). A move with which the executive has tried to armour it after the 4 October ruling with which the Luxembourg judges established that a country can only be classified as secure if this security is guaranteed in a general and uniform manner throughout its territory. The Viminale has already let it be known that it will go before the EU Court to argue its case.

"Judges must be able to assess: EU law prevails"

.

In the note issued by the president of the immigration section of the civil court of Rome, Luciana Sangiovanni, it is specified that "the criteria for designating a State as a safe country of origin are established by European Union law. Therefore, without prejudice to the prerogatives of the national legislator, the judge has the duty to always verify in concrete terms - as in any other sector of the legal system - the correct application of EU law, which, as is well known, prevails over national law where incompatible with it, as also provided for by the Italian Constitution'. The note also clarifies that the exclusion of a State from the list of safe countries of origin does not prevent the return or expulsion of those whose asylum application is rejected: it only affects the applicability or otherwise of the accelerated procedures.

Four Questions to the European Court

In the fifty pages of the decision, the Roman judges put four questions to the EU Court, asking it to "clarify various profiles of doubtful compatibility with the supranational discipline" that emerged after the introduction by the Government of the last Law Decree on safe countries. According to the court, the government has adopted an interpretation of EU law and of the Court of Justice's ruling of 4 October 'diverging from that followed by the Court of Rome in the previous validation proceedings of persons taken to Albania and detained there'. Specifically, they ask whether the law "of the Union precludes a national legislature, which is competent to permit the drawing up of lists of safe countries of origin and to regulate the criteria to be followed and the sources to be used for that purpose, from also proceeding to designate directly, by a primary legislative act, a third country as a safe country of origin".  

Salvini: 'Another political sentence against Italians and their security' 

The reaction of Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Infrastructure, Matteo Salvini, was immediate: 'Another political ruling not against the government, but against Italians and their security. Government and Parliament have the right to react to protect citizens, and they will do so. Provided that some other magistrate, in the meantime, does not sentence me to six years in jail for defending the borders...'. The reference is to the prosecution's request in the Open Arms trial, which sees him in the dock for unlawfully denying in the summer of 2019 the Spanish NGO ship Open Arms to land 147 migrants rescued at sea in the port of Lampedusa. At the centre-right leaders' rally underway in Bologna, the Lega's number one added: 'Nobody takes away from me the idea that those sentences serve the red cooperatives to make money'. From the League he is supported by Claudio Borghi, who shouts in Palazzo Madama that 'the magistrates have crossed the line' and 'are proving to be outside the law'.

Tajani: 'Unacceptable decision, goes against the tripartition of powers'

Harsh tones also came from the other deputy prime minister, Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani: 'In a democracy there is the tripartition of powers. When one of these powers oversteps its boundaries it puts democracy in trouble. There are some magistrates who are trying to impose their political line on the government. This is not acceptable'. "It is not a magistrate," the Forza Italia leader added, "who decides which country is safe because he does not know, because he does not deal with these things. If the government that has the tools to do so says that a country is safe, then there is something wrong'. The president of the Azzurri senators in the Senate assembly goes further by speaking of 'a Capitol Hill in reverse': 'The magistrates are subversive, we need a refounding of the judiciary'.

The National Association of Magistrates: 'Judges do their duty'

.

Faced with the words of the deputy prime ministers and the majority representatives, the ANM intervenes in defence of the magistrates. "I would just like to remind you," says the secretary general Salvatore Casciaro, "that the primacy of EU law is the lintel on which the community of national courts rests and requires the judge, when he considers the domestic legislation incompatible with that of the Union, to apply the latter or, in case of doubt, to make a reference for a preliminary ruling, which was done in this case by the court of Rome. The message is clear: 'One cannot therefore complain that judges are doing their duty nor blame them for stumbling in the pursuit of migration policies that are obviously up to the government to decide but which cannot disregard the European and supranational regulatory framework in which they are set'.

Opposition on the attack: 'No more waste, Piantedosi to report back to the Chamber'

Opposition parties are lashing out against the executive. From the PD thunders the head of security Matteo Mauri: "So much for the so-called 'Albania model'. This is the 'Meloni model': violation of rights, institutional forcing, policemen taken away from their work in Italy and money thrown out of the window! How much longer will it take them to stop this antics?!". Senator Filippo Sensi is also disheartened: 'Truly incredible ineptitude, inability, wastefulness, uselessness'. Fellow M5S Alfonso Colucci denounced the 'ignoble speculation made on people's skin'. For MP Riccardo Magi (+Europa) "the government has an obligation to stop the deportations: there cannot and must not be a third mission before the judgement of the EU Court of Justice on safe countries". Magi also calls for the withdrawal of the amendment by which the Safe Countries Decree was merged in the Senate into the Flussi Decree. While Italia Viva's group leader in Palazzo Madama, Enrico Borghi, told the House: "It is essential that the Minister of the Interior come to this House and explain what is happening in this country!".

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti