Global rankings

Apple, Microsoft and Google top the Interbrand rankings: the value of the top 100 brands has risen by 8.1 per cent to 3.8 trillion dollars

Italia is represented by Ferrari, Gucci and Prada – Nvidia enters the list directly at number six, confirming the strength of technology and the AI sector

La Ferrari Luce, primo modello elettrico della casa di Maranello, tra i “top riser”  della classifica 2026 di Interbrand. A destra e sinistra. Lewis Hamilton e Charles Leclerq, i due piloti della Formula 1 della scuderia

7' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

7' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

In recent days – though we might just as well say in recent months – both the business and financial press and the general media have been covering Anthropic. Firstly, because the American company founded by siblings Dario and Daniela Amodei (following their departure from OpenAI) in 2021 is perhaps the best-known and most influential player in the competitive arena (a term favoured by Interbrand) of artificial intelligence. Secondly, whilst OpenAI is all too easily equated with ChatGPT, Anthropic has made it clear even to the non-specialist public that, for the company, AI has already gone far beyond chatbots and LLM models. Thirdly, but no less importantly, Anthropic has announced that its listing on the New York Stock Exchange is imminent; it could take place before the end of November and be ‘valued’ at $100 billion, even surpassing the record set a few months ago by SpaceX (the lead story in the Financial Times on 27 October), whilst the Washington Post, on the same day, highlighted in its front-page headline that the first half of the year ended with a loss of $80 million, linked to the investments – which we know to be enormous – that Anthropic is making to remain competitive with other American companies and, above all, with Chinese firms.

What can Anthropic “teach us”?

Anthropic does not feature in Interbrand’s Best Global Brands 2026 ranking, the twenty-seventh edition in the consultancy firm’s history, but perhaps it will make the list next year – who knows. This is partly because, amongst the leading players in AI, it is the company that seems to have given the most thought to the values that should guide the development of the technology, so that it continues to be a tool serving people’s lives and work, rather than a danger or something that spreads anxiety and insecurity. This introduction to the company ties in with some observations that can be made about this year’s top 100, which relate in particular to the factors – though it would be better to say values – that go into the evaluation of a brand, as explained by Manfredi Ricca, global chief strategy officer at Interbrand, a leading brand consultancy firm: ‘Until very recently, we rightly believed that a company’s and its brands’ most important asset was their respective “core competencies”; however, the development of artificial intelligence tends to make this core of skills and know-how accessible to everyone, provided the necessary investment is made. It is the values that cannot be replaced, because they stem from the brand’s history and the relationship of trust that has been built up over time – something that can never be replaced by artificial intelligence: it is something profoundly human and, indeed, irreplaceable, and cannot be achieved through technological ‘shortcuts’, however sophisticated they may be.’

Loading...

The ‘winners’ of 2026

But let’s turn to the figures for 2026, which confirm the strength of the brands that have managed to strike a balance between core competencies and values. Interbrand’s Best Global Brands 2026 ranking shows a total brand value exceeding 3.866 trillion dollars, an increase of 8.1 per cent compared with 2025, when the figure stood at 3.575 trillion dollars. (US$ 3.575 trillion). Among the new entries worth highlighting is Nvidia – not coincidentally a company associated with the production of AI chips – into the top 10, having increased its value by over 71 per cent to become the fastest-growing brand of the year, hot on the heels of companies such as Anthropic and OpenAI. Also worth noting is the fact that the entertainment sector has overtaken the automotive sector – which has recorded the sharpest decline – to become the second-largest sector by total value. New entrants include Zurich (#58), Hitachi (#90), GE Healthcare (#95) and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (#99), which reflect the evolution of market dynamics and “the continued emergence of new sources of value creation”, as explained by Interbrand in a statement.

How does Italia rank?

Our country is represented by Ferrari (#51), which has grown by 15 per cent and is among the year’s top risers, and by Gucci (#93) and Prada (#96), which remain in the ranking but have dropped several places. “The ranking highlights an ever-widening gap between brands capable of transforming brand strength into growth and those that continue to rely primarily on reputation. “Beyond the overall figures, an even more significant trend emerges,” explains Manfredi Ricca, “in various sectors, some of the world’s strongest brands have lost ground, whilst others have accelerated, transforming relevance, trust and distinctiveness into a concrete lever for commercial growth. The results confirm what Interbrand has, in fact, always maintained: the brand remains one of a company’s most valuable assets.”

The Nvidia case

The Nvidia case demonstrates that technology remains the main driver of value creation in this year’s ranking (with Apple, Microsoft and Google on the podium), whilst AI continues to reshape markets and create new leaders. Nvidia (#6) stands out amongst the best-performing brands thanks to a value increase of over 71 per cent; Google (#3) takes the third step on the podium, whilst YouTube (#10), Netflix (#23) and Spotify (#39) have recorded significant increases, driven by the growing adoption of digital ecosystems by consumers and businesses. “The success of Netflix and Spotify holds great potential for further growth,” adds Mandredi Ricca. Their business models can be described as ‘scalable’: thanks to their customer base and – once again – the relationship of trust and familiarity that has been established in a relatively short space of time between the brands and consumers, they could move into adjacent sectors. We can imagine Netflix deciding to distribute music and Spotify entering the TV series business.”

Challenges in the automotive sector confirmed

In 2026, the automotive sector was under the most pressure. The average brand value in this sector fell, suggesting that it is becoming increasingly difficult for manufacturers to turn innovation into a genuine differentiating factor. Toyota (#9) remains the highest-ranked brand, despite a decline in value of nearly 20 per cent. Tesla (#50) recorded one of the sharpest falls in value across the entire ranking, dropping 25 places and losing almost 38 per cent of its value. Bucking the trend, brands such as Hyundai (#29), Kia (#87), BYD (#89) and Ferrari (#51) have continued to outperform much of the sector, thanks to clearer brand propositions and more compelling reasons for consumers to buy. “Ferrari is perceived as a lifestyle and high-end brand, not just a car brand,” explains Manfredi Ricca. With patience and perseverance over the last ten years, the brand has entered the clothing and accessories market, under the creative direction of a great talent such as Rocco Iannone, and has decided not to take the ‘shortcut’ of licensing, instead bringing every product line in-house, not only in the fashion sector but also within the supply chain of its core car business. This success is also linked to the enlightened leadership of CEO Benedetto Vigna, because ultimately, we could say that it is people, not AI, who are the driving force behind it all.”

The Polarisation of Luxury

The luxury sector remains one of the strongest sectors in the rankings, but 2026 highlights an increasingly clear divide between brands that have increased their value and those that have, on the other hand, seen a decline. Hermès (#15) has strengthened its position amongst the world’s most valuable luxury brands, whilst Chanel (#24), Cartier (#69) and Tiffany (#91) are also on the rise. The results suggest that heritage continues to represent an important asset for brands in this sector, but only when it is accompanied by cultural relevance, desirability and a customer experience capable of continuing to justify a premium positioning.

The winning strategies of the best-performing brands

The brands that have achieved the best results in the Best Global Brands 2026 are not necessarily the largest or best-known: they are those capable of offering clear reasons for choosing them. Whether it is leadership in AI, premium positioning, ecosystem expansion, innovation or customer experience, the brands that are achieving the best results are transforming brand strength into a commercial advantage, as highlighted by Greg Silverman, global director of brand economics at Interbrand.

Interbrand’s methodology

The first aspect is financial analysis, which measures an organisation’s overall financial return to investors, that is, its economic profit. Economic profit corresponds to the brand’s operating profit after tax, minus the cost of the capital used to generate revenue and margins. Then there is the role of the brand: Interbrand measures the proportion of the purchasing decision attributable to the brand compared with other factors, such as price, value for money or product features. The Role of Brand Index (RBI) expresses this component as a percentage. For each brand, the value used in the Best Global Brands ranking is determined using one of the following methods: commissioned market research; benchmarking against Role of Brand scores obtained from projects carried out for clients in the same sector; or assessment by a panel of experts. The third criterion is Brand Strength, which measures a brand’s ability to build loyalty and, consequently, sustainable demand and profits over time. The analysis is based on the assessment of 10 factors that Interbrand considers fundamental to defining a brand’s strength. Performance is compared both with that of other brands in the sector and with that of leading global brands. The Brand Strength analysis thus enables the identification of the brand’s strengths and weaknesses and the definition of a roadmap of activities aimed at increasing its strength and value over time. The research underpinning the 2026 edition of Best Global Brands was supported by Omnicom Group’s proprietary artificial intelligence software, Omni AI. This proprietary software has enabled the scope and accuracy of the research to be increased sixfold, further strengthening the reliability of the results.

The criteria for inclusion in Interbrand’s analysis

To be included in the Best Global Brands ranking, brands must meet the following criteria: there must be sufficient publicly available data on the brand’s financial performance; at least 30 per cent of revenue must come from areas outside the brand’s region of origin; the brand must have a geographical presence in emerging markets; there must be an expectation of positive long-term financial performance; the brand must have a sufficient level of global awareness; and the Brand Strength Score must be 50 or above. These requirements – which stipulate that a brand must be global, profitable, visible and relatively transparent regarding its financial results – explain the exclusion of certain well-known brands that one might otherwise expect to find in the ranking.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti