The proposed law

Ascani (Pd): 'Vote 2027, sanctions are needed to prevent Ia and foreign states from conditioning the election campaign'

Provided for a reporting mechanism to Agcom, which becomes responsible for both ordering the immediate removal of fake or altered content and imposing administrative sanctions

by Mariolina Sesto

Anna Ascani.

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

We are in the referendum campaign and in a year's time we will be campaigning for general elections. Yet we are defenceless against the possible incursions of artificial intelligence and, even worse, the intrusions of foreign states that aim to heterodirect the outcome of the vote by conditioning public opinion. It is from this concern that the bill presented to the Chamber of Deputies by Anna Ascani, MP of the PD, was born.

Today there is no deterrent against the distortion of election campaigns by the Ai or others?

Loading...

There is only the crime of deepfake, but it is not enough because the criminal process has its own timeframe, much longer than an election campaign, so it cannot be effective and does not solve the problem.

What do you propose in your bill to curb this phenomenon?

I have provided for a reporting mechanism to Agcom, which becomes responsible for both ordering the immediate removal of fake or altered content and imposing administrative sanctions.

Who could, in your opinion, interfere with the election campaign?

The concern is not so much for individuals but for the possibility of foreign powers entering the field and distorting the smooth running of the election campaign.

What else does your bill envisage?

An obligation of transparency: content produced with artificial intelligence must be recognisable as such so as not to mislead users. If they are not, there is the possibility of reporting this to Agcom, which can impose sanctions.

What is the key element that makes the proposed law incisive?

Speed of intervention. If a political entity reports incorrect content to Agcom, Agcom can request its removal within 24 hours. This reduces the distorting effect. If, on the other hand, we have to wait for a deepfake trial to be triggered, we risk this happening after the vote has already taken place.

Are there any signs of openness from the majority?

Our colleagues in the majority are as concerned as we are. But no sign of dialogue has come from the government, so far only suppressive amendments, which are the classic means of blocking opposition bills without debate.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti