Backlog: criminal cases pending down by 33 per cent
Stock levels have fallen from 1.44 million to 955,000
The improvement in processing times goes hand in hand with a structural reduction in pending proceedings, although the first half of 2026 saw a decrease in the number of cases concluded before single-judge courts of first instance and on appeal. These figures underscore the need to consolidate the measures implemented by the judicial administration during what has certainly been an extraordinary period such as that of the NRRP, which concluded in June.
The figures behind the decline
Compared with 2019, which served as the benchmark agreed with the EU, the number of pending criminal cases fell by 30.5 per cent in the district courts, by 45.6 per cent in the courts of appeal and by 55 per cent in the Court of Cassation. Overall, the number of pending cases across the three levels of jurisdiction fell from over 1.44 million in 2019 to around 955,000 as at 30 June 2026, a reduction of 33.7 per cent.
The reduction in the backlog in the first half of 2026 was driven by a decrease in new cases at the Court of Appeal (-6.4 per cent) and an increase in cases settled at the Court of Cassation (+15.3 per cent) and in the District Court (+1.5 per cent) compared with the first half of 2025.
Disposal rate
In 2026, the Court of Appeal also recorded a fall in the number of cases settled, amounting to -15.3 per cent year-on-year, leading to a decrease in the clearance rate (clearance rate), which nevertheless remained at high levels (falling from 1.51 to 1.37). At the Court of Cassation, the clearance rate rose to its highest level since 2019, reaching 1.13, whilst the Court of First Instance has maintained a value close to parity over time (in the first half of 2026 it stood at 0.99).
The 2026 reduction in the number of cases settled at first instance affected both the sections of single-judge hearings (-8.0%) and the criminal courts (-2%). In contrast, the number of cases settled in collegiate hearings and in the preliminary investigation (GIP) and preliminary hearing (GUP) sections increased by 3 per cent and 6 per cent respectively.


