Between artificial intelligence, soft skills and Gen Z: how leadership should be rethought
An analysis conducted by consultancy firm Buono & Partners argues that traditional models based on authority and control are proving less and less effective in managing the new work dynamics and focuses on the crucial role of soft skills
4' min read
4' min read
Is it really a radical transformation that is affecting the concept of leadership (and its application) in today's increasingly complex and hybrid work context, marked by the increasing pervasiveness of digital technologies? It is hard to find arguments to the contrary, and even the recent survey conducted on more than 650 Italian C-Levels by the consultancy firm Buono & Partners in collaboration with YOURgroup and Eggup (Zucchetti Group) goes to confirm how the concatenation of several 'disruptive' phenomena (the pandemic, the large-scale diffusion of artificial intelligence and the entry on the scene of Generation Z) has further accelerated the need for a rethinking of the concept of leadership.
Traditional models increasingly less effective
.The analysis takes as its starting point the observation that traditional models based on authority and control are proving less and less effective in managing the new work dynamics and focuses on the crucial role of soft skills as a resource for defining a leader's effectiveness. Emotional intelligence, empathy, active listening and cognitive agility, reads the note accompanying the study, are the skills that enable managers not only to manage crisis situations, but also to create working environments that foster innovation and collaboration among employees and in which uncertainty is seen not as a threat but as an opportunity. New leaders are therefore required to find inspiration, involvement and continuous adaptation and the report, in this sense, has highlighted the personality traits that are most relevant for managerial success, analysing them through five specific parameters (energy, friendliness, responsibility, emotional stability and open-mindedness) and identifying both the most useful traits for leading a team or an organisation and the possible negative consequences of these same traits, from the risk of burnout to excessive condescension and the slowing down of processes.
The challenge that calls upon the figures of reference in the company is played out on several levels and one of these concerns the ability to develop a leadership that is balanced but at the same time conscious and determined, capable of maximising the benefits of personal characteristics and that goes beyond the simple decision-making role to take on that of facilitator of change and motor for the active involvement of teams.
The underlying objective is, nevertheless, to lead companies with a well-defined purpose, an aspect that is becoming central to modern leadership. In fact, an increasingly marked trend sees a concrete commitment to the achievement of objectives (social responsibility, environmental sustainability and positive contribution to society) that transcend immediate profit becoming more and more the beacon that guides long-term decisions and strategies. And it is an approach, which elevates purpose to a virtuous instrument in the hands of leaders, particularly relevant with respect to the impact of the expectations of the new generations (profoundly different from those of mature workers) on the customs that govern life and relations within a company.
The journey towards a new flexible leadership is a long one and does not hide pitfalls, especially in those companies where the top figure is not a manager but the classic 'old style' entrepreneur (by mindset, by training, by experience and, not least, by age).

