Brazil: Lula and Bolsonaro court the evangelical vote
Voters from Pentecostal churches account for 30 per cent of the population. The evangelical vote is hotly contested but tends to be conservative: 75 per cent of believers support Bolsonaro
At seven o’clock in the evening, on the streets of Rio de Janeiro, the lights in the Evangelical churches come on before those in the shops. Inside, the pews are full; the music swells, and some people weep, some sing, and some pray.
It is a scene that is repeated in thousands of neighbourhoods, from the favelas of São Paulo to the villages of the North-East. In just a few decades, Brazil’s religious landscape has changed, and that change has reached the halls of power. Lula and Flavio Bolsonaro are vying for their votes: the evangelical lobby could determine the outcome of tomorrow’s run-off. Neo-Pentecostals account for over 30 per cent of the population: their brand of Christianity fits in well with the global market, whilst the Prosperity Gospel encourages people to become wealthy. The proportion of Catholics has fallen from 89 per cent in 1995 to 56 per cent today.
The figures matter, but they are not enough to explain the political clout. What is striking is the discipline: on sensitive issues such as abortion, gender identity, sex education and euthanasia, the evangelical camp tends to present a united front. Its supporters speak of defending the family; its critics see it as an attempt to impose religious morality on a country that is secular by constitution.
It is impossible to understand Brazilian politics without focusing on the three ‘bancadas’, the power blocs within Brazil’s National Congress: the Bancada da Bíblia (the Bible bloc), the Bancada da Bala (the arms bloc) and the Bancada do Boi (the agribusiness bloc).
The term ‘Evangelical’ encompasses a variety of groups: the large Pentecostal churches, the neo-Pentecostal communities, and the small neighbourhood congregations. Many of these have sprung up on the outskirts of towns, close to where people go about their daily struggles and far from public services.

