Parliament

Hunting: Senate gives the green light to the bill – from firearms to suspension periods, all the latest developments

A plan to update a regulatory framework that has remained unchanged since 1992. Environmentalists are up in arms. But over the past 35 years, the number of hunters has fallen by two-thirds and wildlife populations have soared

by Giorgio dell'Orefice

 Adobe Stock

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The Senate has given the green light to the reform of the hunting law, with 80 votes in favour, 56 against and two abstentions. The bill now passes to the Chamber of Deputies. The regulations laid down in Law 157 of 1992 have been revised after almost 35 years.

This green light was granted amidst a heated atmosphere both inside and outside the chamber. The bill – tabled by the FdI group leader, Lucio Malan – was the subject of over 900 amendments, mostly from opposition parties, who have dubbed it the ‘free-for-all’ because it would expand hunting opportunities and jeopardise public safety and wildlife protection. Representatives from the M5S and the PD took part in the sit-in against the bill organised by Legambiente, LAC, LAV, ENPA, LIPU and WWF.

Loading...

On the one hand, environmental organisations have repeatedly highlighted the risk of deregulation in relation to hunting, going so far as to raise the spectre of hunters being able to carry out their activities with rifles on the beach amongst bathers; on the other hand, hunting organisations argue that the regulatory framework, which is almost 35 years old, needs to be updated.

The farms most affected by wildlife

Against this backdrop, the Italian agricultural sector has in recent years seen a massive proliferation of wildlife, which now poses a threat both to farming (with damage to crops becoming increasingly frequent) and to public safety, as demonstrated by the statistics on road accidents.

Over the past 35 years, the number of hunters has fallen from 1.5 million to 500,000

Another well-established fact is that the number of hunters has certainly not increased in recent years. When Law 157/92 was enacted, there were 1.4–1.5 million hunters in Italia, whereas today that figure has fallen below 500,000.

The ‘mystery’ surrounding the letter of objections from Brussels

The most recent controversy, in chronological order, occurred just a few weeks ago when centre-left senators revealed the contents of a letter sent by an official from the European Commission to a senior official at the Ministry of the Environment, setting out a number of specific objections to the reform. ‘A letter,’ commented the PD senators, ‘which the Government had decided to keep hidden.’

Specifically, the objections raised concerned the extension of the hunting season on agritourism and hunting estates beyond the ordinary season, the weakening of ISPRA’s advisory role regarding any extensions (from binding to advisory) and against the provisions on the capture and rearing of live decoys, extending the current limit of 40 live decoys per hunter to 40 live decoys from capture and a potentially unlimited number of live decoys from rearing.

All these accusations were dismissed by the president of Federcaccia, Massimo Buconi, who stated that ‘external interference in a government measure that had yet to complete its legislative process was unacceptable’.

MPs’ appeal to Meloni: stop the bill

On the eve of the bill’s approval, a group of MPs from various political parties appealed to the Prime Minister to withdraw the bill. The signatories are calling for “an act of responsibility to halt a reform that threatens biodiversity, public safety and the rule of law”.

The main points of the reform measure

Let’s take a brief look at the most hotly debated aspects of this reform measure. Firstly, there is the issue of extending hunting grounds: hunting will also be permitted on state-owned land (including beaches), in parks and in protected areas, although the final say on the matter rests with the regions.

This is where the concept of wildlife ‘management’ comes into play

One of the key points is the introduction of the concept of wildlife ‘management’. This principle addresses the need to tackle the uncontrolled proliferation of wildlife, which not only poses a threat to the safety of people and property but is also a vector for the spread of diseases such as African swine fever.

Regional administrations’ administrative role has been strengthened

This also strengthens the influence of regional authorities with regard to hunting seasons, which may be extended (including during the migration and nesting periods), thereby allowing hunting to continue even after sunset.

More lenient rules have been introduced regarding the use of live decoys and the expansion of the list of species that may be hunted.

Finally, on the subject of licences, a nationwide recognition scheme for licences to hunt ungulates through culling has been introduced, thereby avoiding the need to repeat the application process in different regions.

Federcaccia: updating the rules means providing answers to the public

“For us,” added Federcaccia’s president, Massimo Buconi, “the Senate’s scrutiny represents a crucial step towards finally getting the framework law back on track after more than thirty years. It is regrettable to note that the public debate has been marred by ideological slogans and fanciful claims, such as the truly surreal notion of hunting on the beach. Updating the rules means providing concrete answers to citizens and farmers, tackling the economic emergency caused by African swine fever, and protecting biodiversity through management based on scientific analysis of the characteristics of different territories.”

'me'.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti