Career separation, the Anm attacks Nordio: in 1994 he was against it. The minister: for 30 years I have changed my mind
On the Association's website the letter signed in 1994. The minister: 'I changed my mind after the suicide of one of my suspects'.
Key points
3' min read
The clash between the government and magistrates is getting more and more bitter. On a day on which the plenum of the Csm approved by a majority vote the case for the protection of the deputy prosecutor of the Supreme Court Raffaele Piccirillo, the magistrate criticised by Nordio for his interview on the Almasri case, there is also the publication of an old document by the ANM in which the current Minister of Justice Nordio sided against the career separation. A constitutional reform approved two days ago in second reading by the Senate and sponsored with conviction by the Guardasigilli and the entire government
Document from Anm: Nordio signed against career separation
"Against as a public prosecutor, in favour as a minister. Carlo Nordio, the keeper of the seals who today gives his name to the constitutional bill for the separation of careers, is the same Carlo Nordio who, as a public prosecutor, signed an appeal against the separation. This is shown by this letter signed by the then magistrate in Venice and sent to the ANM. It was 3 May 1994'. This is what can be read on the online site 'La magistratura', a magazine edited by the National Association of Magistrates, which also publishes a 1994 document with the header of the Public Prosecutor's Office at the Venice Court, which was sent by fax to the Rome headquarters of the National Association of Magistrates, in which Nordio signed, together with other magistrates, that he was 'against the division of the careers of magistrates with prosecuting and judging functions'.
Nordio: changed my mind after suicide case of one of my suspects
The Guardasigilli's reply was prompt: 'In those years I was against the separation of careers because I hoped that the judiciary would remain united, in times of massacres and tangentopoli. Then there was the case of the suicide of a suspect in one of my investigations in Venice. From there I realised that it was going too far and in 1995 I changed my mind, so much so that even some newspapers the next day headlined my new decision. I was certainly not the only one among magistrates, politicians and journalists to change their minds. In 1997 I was called by the probiviri of the ANM to account for my ideas, which I reiterated'. Thus the Minister of Justice to Ansa.


