Cassation, Nordio: 'Blasphemous to say that the reform undermines the independence of the judiciary'
The Justice Minister, speaking at the Court of Cassation for the opening of the judicial year, rejects the accusations: 'No attack on autonomy and independence'. President of the Republic Sergio Mattarella present
Key points
'My presence' for the fourth year at the inauguration of the judicial year 'demonstrates government stability, which is a decisive factor for domestic and international credibility'. Thus Justice Minister Carlo Nordio.
Under the gaze of the Head of State, Sergio Mattarella, the Court of Cassation opens the 2026 judicial year in the Aula Magna: a ceremony that, in addition to the ritual, brings to the stage the most sensitive political-institutional issue, that of the independence of the judiciary. First President Pasquale D'Ascola and Attorney General Piero Gaeta will be in the front row; speeches by Justice Minister Carlo Nordio and SCCM Vice-President Fabio Pinelli are expected. Also present will be the Presidents of the Chamber and Senate Lorenzo Fontana and Ignazio La Russa, the President of the Constitutional Court Giovanni Amoroso and the Undersecretary to the Prime Minister Alfredo Mantovano.
The reform
The Minister of Justice Carlo Nordio, speaking in the Aula Magna of the Court of Cassation for the opening of the judicial year, rejected in the harshest terms the idea that the reform under discussion could undermine the constitutional guarantees of the judiciary. For Nordio, claiming that the reform 'tends to undermine' the independence and autonomy of judges is not only an unfounded accusation: it is a distorted reading that overturns the very meaning of the intervention, almost turning it into an attack on the judicial order.
In his reasoning, the point is to prevent the institutional confrontation from slipping into a terrain of ideological opposition, where every regulatory change is automatically interpreted as an attempt to compress the autonomy of the judiciary. Nordio therefore asserted that the reform, at least in the government's intentions, is not moving against the judiciary, but within a perimeter of rules and arrangements that remain compatible with constitutional principles: this is why he defined it as 'blasphemous' to attribute to it purposes of weakening independence.
In essence, the minister's message is that the debate should focus on the substance and concrete effects of the rules, not on a 'principled' narrative that, in his view, risks fuelling a permanent conflict between the powers of the State and poisoning the climate around justice.

