Technology

Chip between tariff war, Taiwan and autarky: why the industry is at risk

The China-US trade war creates difficulties for companies. Bringing production to their own areas? The Intel case shows that it is not easy

Nvidia sorpassa Microsoft, è la società che vale di più al mondo

3' min read

3' min read

"The US government's 'restrictive actions', '(...) especially in light of the current trade tensions with China (...) may', in part, 'adversely affect our ability to sell products (...)', writes integrated semiconductor manufacturer Broadcom in its latest quarterly report. As a result of the export controls 'the freedom to license our products (...) may be reduced', echoes chip architecture designer Arm in its latest quarterly report.

These are just some of the indications that can be found in the financial reports of western silicon companies. Of course! The law requires that every possible risk be disclosed to the market. And yet, the repeated presence of such statements in multiple groups shows how the topic at hand - the technology trade war between Washington and Beijing - is a crucial issue for the semiconductor world.

Loading...

A dated war

.

The long-running dispute has been a series of bickering and back-and-forth. In 2019, the US put the giant Huawei on the Entity List and then, in 2020, added the Chinese chip giant Smic. Then, again in 2023, Washington launches a series of controls - and restrictions - on the export of the most advanced semiconductor technologies to the former Middle Kingdom. In particular, those for artificial intelligence. Beijing's reaction is not long in coming. On the one hand, it prohibits the use of microchips made by the US company Micron (citing computer security problems); and, on the other, it announces restrictions on the export of Germanium and Gallium, two minerals essential to the production of microprocessors.

Thus, in the most classic of escalations (to which must be added news such as that - last May - of the creation in China, in clear response to the US Chip and Science Act of 2022 - of a $47.5 billion fund for semiconductors), the industrial and commercial environment is tightening.

Commodity prices

.

So much so that fears are growing. An example? It is offered by the price dynamics of the very gallium of which Beijing produces 98% of the world's supply. Ft has calculated that, at present, the cost of gallium in China is around $420 per kilogram, while in Europe it is almost $550. In this specific case, it is clear how there is an imbalance - to the disadvantage of Western producers - on the operating costs front. Not only that. The supply of such materials - essential in the semiconductor factory - becomes complex to manage.

Beyond raw materials, another front that does not let one sleep soundly is that of autarky. That is to say: given the geopolitical clash, many thought that the way forward was to shorten (especially geographically) the production chain. The tens of billions put on the table, in America and the former Middle Kingdom, to strengthen and build from scratch production plants in their areas of influence are proof of this. However, transforming the most globalised of industries into a local business is a chimera. At least, in a short time. Proof of this comes from Intel's collapse. The US group has invested heavily in new factories. Billion-dollar outlays, however, without an immediate return and which, by squeezing margins, have disappointed the market. So much so that on the Nasdaq the group's 2024 share price is down 61%.

The Taiwanese risk

.

Yes, the listing. On closer inspection, the market prices of chip groups, in general, do not discount another risk: that of the escalation between the US and China for control of Taiwan. The island of Formosa is Tsmc's main production base. That is: the world's largest contract factory. From its 'ovens' pass the chips of many big tech companies: from Nvidia (30% of the Californian group's volumes) to Apple. Well: the moment the situation degenerates, important parts of the microprocessor supply chain would inevitably go haywire.

Here, on closer inspection, the willingness and ability of the two contending parties to find a negotiated solution will count. Consequently, all eyes are now on the US presidential election. Donald Trump, the Republican candidate, with his statement that Formosa should pay the US for the defence of the island has already brought down (at least in the stock market) the industry. Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate, for her part, is expected to be unfazed by Biden's strategy. But one knows: electoral indications - often - leave time to be found.

Per approfondire

La mega concentrazione degli utili delle big tech

Leggi l’articolo

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti