The summit of heads of government

Disagreement amongst the 27 over energy; new measures called for from the Commission

European leaders are discussing urgent measures to curb rising energy prices, with deep divisions over the role of the CO₂ emissions trading scheme

from our correspondent Beda Romano

Aggiungi Il Sole 24 Ore
ai preferiti su Google
epa13305728 La presidente della Commissione europea Ursula von der Leyen e il presidente francese Emmanuel Macron (a destra) durante un vertice del Consiglio europeo a Bruxelles, in Belgio, il 15 ottobre 2026. I capi di Stato e di governo dell’Unione europea (UE) si riuniscono per un vertice di due giorni, il 15 e il 16 ottobre 2026, incentrato sulla competitività europea e sui prezzi dell’energia, sul bilancio a lungo termine dell’UE per il periodo 2028-2034, sul proseguimento del sostegno all’Ucraina, la sicurezza e la difesa europee, la migrazione, l’allargamento e le riforme, nonché gli sviluppi in Medio Oriente.  EPA/OLIVIER HOSLET EPA

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

BRUSSELS – Meeting for the first European summit since the summer break, European Union leaders held a heated discussion on the energy crisis of recent weeks. Aside from calling on the European Commission “to propose (…) further measures” to tackle the sharp rise in energy prices, deep divisions emerged amongst the 27 Member States regarding the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). Italy was at the forefront in highlighting the social risks posed by the scheme.

In essence, in addition to the European Commission’s already stated intentions – to extend any state aid for the companies hardest hit by the energy crisis, to build new refineries, and to pool European demand when purchasing raw materials – the 27 Member States were to ask the Commission, according to a draft set of conclusions, to ‘examine and propose, where necessary, further measures to tackle the sharp rise in energy prices in the short term’.

Loading...

It is not yet clear what the new measures might be. Attention is turning to recent French proposals to relax fuel quality requirements and to make greater use of biofuels in the petrol blend. It should also be noted that Italia is currently negotiating the so-called ‘utility bills decree’ with the European Commission. In this case, the aim is to reduce the price-setting fuel, namely gas, so that the effects are also felt on electricity bills.

The truth is that the energy crisis triggered by the war against Iran launched by the United States and Israel is affecting countries in different ways. Those still dependent on gas and oil are suffering more than those that have invested heavily in renewable energy sources. More generally, Europe’s oil and gas bill has risen by 100 billion euros since the conflict broke out. According to information gathered on the sidelines of the summit, discussions amongst the leaders were particularly heated.

The debate on ETS

To put it simply, the debate has pitted certain countries against one another, primarily Italy and the Visegrád countries, which are effectively calling for the role of the ETS in decarbonising the economy to be scaled back because it is too costly, and others such as Denmark, Sweden and Finland, which, on the other hand, regard the ETS as an effective tool for promoting independence from fossil fuels. The position of these countries is also influenced by the substantial investments they have already made.

The issue of the ETS is complex, not least because there are two markets – both of which are based on the principle that polluting companies must pay by purchasing the necessary allowances. Established twenty years ago, the ETS 1 covers industry as a whole and is currently undergoing a review following a proposal from the European Commission tabled before the summer recess.

The second issue concerns the ETS 2 market, which mainly covers road transport and the property sector and is not yet operational. The 27 Member States had already decided at the end of last year to postpone its entry into force from 2027 to 2028. Some countries have called for the start date to be pushed back even further, to as late as 2030 – including Italy, Greece and the Visegrád Group countries (Poland, Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Hungary).

According to information gathered on the sidelines of the meeting, which is still in progress, member states were discussing amendments to the conclusions negotiated at diplomatic level; these amendments would introduce a commitment by the European Commission to update the impact assessment of ETS 2 across all areas, particularly the social aspects. Originally, the issue of ETS 2 was not included in the draft conclusions drawn up at a technical level.

During the summit, a number of political leaders, such as Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Greek Prime Minister Kyriákos Mitsotákis, raised the issue of greater budgetary flexibility. In Brussels, no one wants to jeopardise the Stability Pact, but there is a willingness – whilst respecting the rules – to accommodate countries facing energy difficulties. That said, there is considerable reluctance to allow consumption subsidies, an option that is costly, inefficient and increases dependence on oil and gas.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti