Hacker

Cryptocurrency: attacks on Chainalysis, the blockchain analytics giant

The company has reported unauthorised access to its systems. Here is what MiCAR-authorised crypto-asset service providers need to do to protect themselves

FOTO D'ARCHIVIO: In questa illustrazione realizzata il 10 settembre 2025 è raffigurata una rappresentazione delle criptovalute. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustrazione/Foto d'archivio Reuters

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Cryptocurrency: the attack on Chainalysis serves as a reminder to boards of directors to prioritise security.

Even providers of anti-money laundering tools for cryptocurrencies are vulnerable to cyber-attacks. On 30 October 2026, Chainalysis – one of the best-known names in blockchain analysis – reported unauthorised access to its systems: this involved users’ names, email addresses, identifiers and roles. The company reports that offensive techniques based on artificial intelligence agents were used. At this stage of the investigation, there is no evidence of access to investigative data, plaintext passwords or session tokens. This incident is distinct from the theft of approximately $6.3 billion reported by Binance.

Loading...

A further risk is the use of that data to create credible requests, targeted specifically at those responsible for managing controls and confidential information. Chainalysis recommends two-factor authentication and caution regarding unexpected requests to change passwords or verify identity.

For MiCAR-authorised crypto-asset service providers, both Italian and European, the issue concerns governance. DORA (EU Regulation 2022/2554, the Regulation on digital operational resilience and the management of ICT risks in the financial sector) requires the management of ICT risk, the protection of data and the oversight of technology providers. Responsibility remains with the management body even when services are outsourced.

Board members with expertise in compliance and anti-money laundering should promote formal guidelines from the Board of Directors to the relevant departments and ensure coordination between the AML, cyber security and data protection functions. The procedures should provide for verification via previously verified contact details, separate from those indicated in the request; dual authorisation for the transmission of sensitive data; the transmission of only the necessary data via secure channels; access restricted to operational requirements; and the tracking of accesses and alerts regarding anomalous data retrievals.

The checks must also cover requests that appear to come from regular advisers or authorities, ensuring that legitimate requests are dealt with promptly. The Revolut case has already prompted the Data Protection Authority to ask banks to investigate unusual communications originating from an official certified email address. The formal source alone is not sufficient to verify the authenticity and relevance of the request.

It is also necessary to ask suppliers which data have been affected, update the risk assessment and prepare the incident response, whilst assessing the reporting obligations under the Dora and the GDPR. For boards of directors, information protection is an integral part of effective anti-money laundering safeguards.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti