Intervention

Culture, we need an industrial strategy

The 'dear old culture' is no longer enough. This is not a provocation, let alone a rejection of what has been. It is, rather, an acknowledgement of a necessary evolution. It is so because the transformation processes that are affecting our economy present heterogeneous and changing dynamics, where exogenous variables play an increasingly important role.

by Federico Freni*.

3' min read

3' min read

The 'dear old culture' is no longer enough. This is not a provocation, let alone a rejection of what has been. It is, rather, an acknowledgement of a necessary evolution. It is so because the transformation processes that are affecting our economy present heterogeneous and changing dynamics, where exogenous variables play an increasingly important role. It would be illusory to imagine solitary paths alien to a global or globalised scenario that, on the contrary, solicits and stimulates virtuous contaminations, while respecting the specificities of individual countries.

It is therefore within this perimeter that national policies must rediscover the challenge of cultural identity. An identity that must be declined also, if not above all, in a productive dimension, where the cultural and creative industry shapes the country's growth model. The impact is not only the direct one on GDP: the added value of this sector is given by its capacity to intercept countless dimensions, from sustainability to social inclusion, cohesion and innovation.

Loading...

It is, in other words, a vector running through all the components of growth, with a multiplier effect that is too often underestimated.

Updating the challenge implies long-term planning that defines an identity capable of combining the solidity of tradition with new opportunities. The starting point is solid, as the data of the latest Symbola Foundation Report attest: the cultural system generated an added value of 104.3 billion in 2023, an increase of 12.7% compared to 2019 (see Il Sole 24 Ore of 20 September). However, if the sectors that benefited from this trend are also taken into account, this value rises to 296.9 billion. The driving effect of the sector is evident. And it is even more so if one looks at the contribution that the NRP is making. Here too, the figures show that the petrol poured into the engine is fulfilling its function: Italy is among the countries that are spending the Plan's resources allocated to culture better and faster. With the Plan it was decided to focus on investments - the energy efficiency of physical places, from theatres to museums, and the improvement of accessibility and environmental sustainability - and reforms that combine the valorisation of the current heritage with innovative actions for the creation of a digital heritage of culture that is also functional to facilitate the development of a complementary market of cultural services for businesses. This working method should be a benchmark for future actions.

But the legacy that the NRP leaves us is also, if not above all, a legacy in method. Stable growth requires, first and foremost, investment planning: we need multi-year strategic plans, no longer mere annual projections.

However, a reflection must be made here on the contribution that comes from public expenditure. Over the years, the dynamics of current expenditure devoted to culture has been significantly affected by the economic cycle. The crises of the last fifteen years have inevitably reduced the margins for intervention. It is now necessary to ensure a stable dynamic for cultural investments, in line with the goal of structural and no longer episodic growth. The necessary public action can and must be complemented by the contribution of the private sector. The false public-private dichotomy is the child of an ancient heritage, which wants 'true' culture to be far removed from the economic centres of power. I believe that the country is ripe to abandon certain mouldy patterns and is ready to open the door to a functional collaboration that can set aside outdated ideologies.

The challenge, however, cannot end with the stability of resources and the qualitative improvement of investments. It is crucial to accompany the evolution of cultural identity at all levels, starting with the school level. It is time to decisively abandon the easy trivialisations that can be condensed into the motto 'with culture you cannot eat'. To think of a new economy of culture means, first of all, to be able to speak of a culture industry. Every book, every theatre, every concert: everything feeds into an organic planning system that must outline a strategy that is, precisely, industrial. Which, after all, is true: with culture you do not eat. With culture one feeds.

*Under Secretary for the Economy and Finance

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti