EU Standards

Deforestation, the impact of Eudr on importers

Effects of the regulation limited to the first operators in the sectors concerned. Expected benefits for EU production to stem the invasion of Chinese goods

 (Adobe Stock)

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

It has been a long and complex negotiation on Eudr (the European Deforestation Regulation that came into force two years ago and will be applicable this year), but in the end European companies in the sectors concerned (from agribusiness to wood-furniture to textiles) can breathe a sigh of relief.

The Faqs published by the Commission a few weeks ago (which have legal force for all intents and purposes) have in fact incorporated many of the requests made in recent years by the industry, which had criticised the increase in costs and bureaucratic complexities resulting from this regulation, which was created with the shared objective of guaranteeing the legality, transparency and sustainability of wood-derived products marketed in the EU.

Loading...

Well, the Commission has clarified that the responsibility and obligation of due diligence (previously extended to all operators in the supply chains concerned, including the producers of finished products intended for export) is limited to the first operators, i.e. those who generate the timber extraction or import.

However, the application dates have changed: 30 December 2026 for large and medium-sized companies and 30 June 2027 for micro and small companies, with the exception of products already included in the previous deforestation regulation, the Eutr.

"This is good news for a large part of the supply chain, which has thus been relieved of the impact of the regulation, but the problem remains for the operators concerned," observes Paolo Fantoni, president of Assopannelli and vice-president of FederlegnoArredo for the wood section. According to data reported by FederlegnoArredo, in fact, "the set of measures adopted reduces the annual compliance costs for companies by about 75%, from an estimated EUR 8.1 billion when the regulation came into force in 2023 to about EUR 2 billion today. These costs are offset by environmental benefits estimated at around EUR 7 billion per year, corresponding to 208 thousand hectares of avoided deforestation and 49 million tonnes of emissions saved annually".

However, some shadows remain: 'All products imported from non-European countries will have to offer importers due diligence on the origin of the manufactured goods, whether furniture, components, boards or processed products,' Fantoni observes. 'And this is a serious difficulty, because for many countries due diligence does not exist and, consequently, having this documentation on the origin of the wood, with even geolocation data when available, will be detrimental to operators who currently import from non-EU countries.

However, the rule could also bring benefits to companies in the sectors concerned, in a complex market phase in which European production is threatened by the invasion of Asian products (Chinese in particular) that do not respect the strict rules imposed by the Eudr. It should in fact - if real and strict customs controls are applied - stem the import of non-compliant products.

"We expect Eudr to curb the aggressiveness and competitiveness of Chinese, Vietnamese and other non-European exporters by rewarding value-added production. But the problem remains for those who have to import the raw material instead'.

This helps the supply chain, which, as the data released by FederlegnoArredo for the month of March showed, is suffering significantly from the dual crisis generated by the imposition of tariffs on the US market and the war in Iran, with heavy losses on the non-EU export front (-17.4% compared to March 2025). Things are going a little better for the panels sector, Fantoni explains, which closed 2025 with a 2.2% increase in production turnover, while exports in January were up 1.1%, while the overall industry turnover fell by 13% in the same month.

"The sector is working a little under the weather, but less than one might imagine," Fantoni explains. "The paradox is that the closure of Hormuz, while creating cost increases and raw material shortages, is favouring our exports to certain markets, such as North Africa, traditionally served by producers like Turkey, which is now struggling to compete on the Mediterranean market. Qthis increase is partially offsetting, with significant volumes, the drop in sales recorded on the domestic market.

Copyright reserved ©

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti