Greenland, Denmark: 'We could not convince the US'. Trump: 'We will find solution'. European countries send military
Today 50 minutes of face-to-face talks between US Vice President Vance and Secretary of State Rubio and Danish and Greenlandic diplomacy aiming to convince Trump to give up annexation in exchange for concessions
"We are ready and willing to do more" for security in the Arctic. The United States already has 'extensive military access' to Greenland and can ask to increase its presence, and any request from Washington will be 'examined' constructively. So said Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen after his meeting in Washington with Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Following the summit, Rasmussen admitted that 'so far we have not succeeded in getting the US to change its position', adding that 'it is clear that the president has this desire to take over Greenland, and we have made it unequivocally clear that this is not in our interest'.
On the issue, US President Trump stated: 'I think a solution will be found'. The tycoon also assured that he had 'a very good relationship' with Denmark and repeated that Greenland 'we need it for national security'.
Trump had previously refused to rule out the use of military force to obtain the world's largest island, claiming that the US needs it for defence. Rubio retracted these statements, claiming that the goal is to acquire Greenland. The Danes have stated that it is not their right to sell it, and the Greenlanders that there is no amount of money that can buy their land. At a press conference in Washington, Greenlandic Foreign Minister Motzfeldt said: 'We do not want the United States to control us'. The Danes argue that a comprehensive defence agreement dating back to 1951 already allows the United States to use the territory at will for defensive purposes, making any acquisition unnecessary.
On Wednesday Trump, in a post on Truth, had declared the necessity of Greenland for US national security, adding: 'Nato becomes much more formidable and effective with Greenland in the hands of the US. Anything below this is unacceptable'. The Arctic island 'is crucial for the Golden Dome we are building. NATO should pave the way for us to get it. If we don't do it, Russia or China will, and that cannot happen! Militarily speaking, without the vast power of the United States, NATO would not be an effective force or deterrent, not even close!"
"Which side, Greenland man?" the White House then asked in a provocative image posted on its institutional profile. Indeed, the official White House profile posts an image showing what it believes to be the choice facing Greenland (represented by two dog sleds): it can either side with the United States and enjoy a bright future or face a storm represented by the joint forces of Russia and China.


