Piano casa, stretta anti furbetti. Dati al Fisco e stop ai benefici
di Giuseppe Latour e Giovanni Parente
6' min read
6' min read
Only three people with disabilities have won an Oscar. Deaf actor Troy Kotsu was awarded the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor in 2022: 'I just want to say that I dedicate this award to the deaf community, the C.O.D.A. community and the disabled community. This is our moment,' he said in his acceptance speech. Before him, deaf actress from childhood Marlee Matlin in 1987 and World War II veteran Harold Russell in 1946.
Talent comes first but, in the case of artists with disabilities, this is not a guaranteed right: the world of entertainment, from music to film, does not welcome disability. But it oppresses its spaces and representations by excluding talents with disabilities through "ableist" narratives that, by leaving behind "non-conforming bodies", suggest the existence of a socially established norm with respect to what is considered "conforming". Exclusion is one side of the same coin: the one whereby, when disabled artists are not cut off, they are considered solely and exclusively by virtue of their disability. A similarly ableist approach that, with the apparent intention of inclusion, discriminates.
It is called 'inspiration porn' and it is the expression that activist Stella Young explored in her famous 2012 Ted Talk to describe a rhetoric that made many people with disabilities uncomfortable but still unnamed. In the rhetoric of inspiration porn, a person with a disability is shown as inspiring not so much because of achievements, but because of the fact that he or she succeeds despite the disability. The use made of these stories is far from true empathy. "I use the term pornography deliberately," says Young in the Ted Talk, "because it implies the objectification of one group of people for the benefit of another group of people.
This can apply both in representation and in behaviour: it is an effect of inspiration porn, for example, to consider it right to congratulate a person with a disability because 'in spite of everything' they go to work, have children or simply have a social life. This approach emerges clearly both in narratives that represent people with disabilities through pietism and in those in which they are portrayed as superheroes in possession of some superhuman power or strength that, despite their 'diversity', allows them to be special and therefore better than others.
Both representations, from literature to film and TV series, have distorted the perception of disability in reality. "The purpose of these images is to provide inspiration so that you can look at them and think: Well, as difficult as my life is, it could be worse. I could be that person. But what if you are that person?" adds Young in another passage of his speech, continuing: "Those images reduce disabled people to objects for the benefit of non-disabled people.