Electrolux: Urso calls a meeting for early October
After meeting with local authorities in the regions concerned, the minister will attend the Competitiveness Council in Brussels and then convene a further meeting at the Mimit
The Electrolux dispute has returned to where it began: the Mimit. The trade unions believe that the new plan presented by the company is unworkable and ‘does not identify the structural measures needed to safeguard the future and competitiveness of the Italian sites’, explains Massimiliano Nobis of Fim. According to Barbara Tibaldi of Fiom, “an operation is underway to reduce capacity at the Italian plants by shifting production to other parts of the world. However, this course of action seems more like a first step towards selling or closing the plants, rather than reviving Italian production”.
The latest meeting at the Ministry with Urso
The Minister for Enterprise and Made in Italy, Adolfo Urso, said he wished to “meet once again with the five regional governors of the areas where this major household appliance multinational has its factories, in order to coordinate the position of the Italian institutions with them. It is my intention to convene the ministerial round-table in the first week of October, partly to fully assess, together with them, the company and the trade unions, the measures we have requested from the EU and which will be on the agenda of the next Competitiveness Council meeting to be held in Brussels on 24 September. Europe has accepted our request to include our proposal on the agenda for that Council meeting as well; this proposal, which has been supported by France, Germany and Poland – that is, the other major European industrial nations – calls for the household appliances sector to be designated as strategic, just like the automotive sector.”
The failure of the technical working groups
The reduction in redundancies from over 1,700 to 1,450, as announced at the technical meetings in early September, as well as the increase in production from the initial 2.5 million units to 3 million, do not, in the view of the trade unions, guarantee sustainable employment levels, particularly now that various projects to relocate production are underway.
The relocation of production
The best-known example of production relocation concerns the Cerreto d’Esi site in the Marche region, which is set to cease operations at the end of the year: the production of cooker hoods will be moved to the sister plant in Poland, but, as the trade unions complain, ‘no reindustrialisation plan has yet been proposed’, Tibaldi points out.
Then there are the sites in Susegana where fridges are manufactured: in this case, the multinational’s plans reportedly also include transferring part of the production – specifically the lower value-added portion – to contract manufacturers in China. Porcia would lose part of its production of washer-dryers, a product that the European market struggles to recognise and which is made uncompetitive by Italian production costs. Hence the decision to transfer part of production to a sister site in Thailand. There would be no major changes for Solaro other than its involvement in the productivity improvement plan.

