Revelation

Epstein files, Nyt: over 50 unpublished pages on complaint against Trump

According to the newspaper, three FBI memos, with their notes, do not appear in the documents released by the US Department of Justice

Il presidente degli Stati Uniti Donald J. Trump

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Key documents related to a sexual assault allegation against Donald Trump are missing from the Jeffrey Epstein files released by the US Department of Justice. This was noted in an analysis by the New York Times, which examined the official index of investigative materials made public and found the absence of several FBI memos related to the testimony of a woman who reported in 2019 that she was assaulted, as a minor, by both the financier and the then-future president. The allegations have not been verified in court.

The issue closely touches on one of the most delicate steps of the maxi-release of documents ordered after the passage of the federal law - the Epstein Files Transparency Act - that imposed transparency on the Epstein files. When the Justice Department released millions of pages of materials in late January, it assured that the package included all documents sent by the public to the FBI. The official release pointed out that the papers also included sensationalist and unsubstantiated allegations against Trump, submitted in the run-up to the 2020 election.

Loading...
Epstein, il fratello di Virginia Giuffre: Ciò che ha fatto non è vano

According to the New York Times reconstruction, however, the public index of records clearly indicates the existence of four interviews conducted by the FBI with the woman in 2019. Of these, only the summary of the first, centred on the allegations against Epstein, has been published. The other three reports, along with the underlying investigative notes, are absent. An analysis of the serial numbering of the available pages suggests that over fifty pages of material related to the affair are not included in the public file.

The Justice Department told the New York newspaper thatany omissions would only concern documents covered by legal privilege or duplicates. In a second statement it added that some materials may have been withheld due to "ongoing federal investigations". No specific explanation was given as to why the memos relating to the allegations against Trump do not appear in the release.

The woman came forward in July 2019, a few days after Epstein's arrest for sex trafficking. In an interview on 24 July that year, a summary of which has been made public, she told officers that she had been repeatedly abused in the 1980s, when she was between 13 and 15 years old. She said she was approached in South Carolina under the pretext of a babysitting job at a house on Hilton Head Island. Once she arrived, she reported finding only a man who introduced himself as 'Jeff' and who, according to her account, allegedly administered alcohol and drugs to her before abusing her several times.

Last year, in another document included in the published files, federal officials also summarised the accusation against Trump: the woman claimed that Epstein introduced her to the future president and that the latter assaulted her in an episode described as violent. The documents do not contain any official FBI assessment of the credibility of the complaint.

During the first interview with the agents, the woman showed a widely circulated photograph on her phone depicting Epstein with Trump. She authorised the FBI to photograph the image, asking that it be cropped to exclude Trump's face. Her lawyer explained to investigators that the client feared possible retaliation if it involved "well-known individuals".

The three subsequent interviews, conducted between August and October 2019, were supposed to deepen the coherence of the narrative and verify elements of feedback. However,the relevant summaries are not in the public files. Not even Democratic Congressman Robert Garcia, the ranking member of the House Oversight Committee, found those documents when he examined unredacted versions at the Justice Department. Garcia told the New York Times that the missing materials were not turned over to the committee either, despite a subpoena issued last year to obtain the entire investigative file on Epstein.Democrats have therefore announced their intention to open a separate investigation into the omissions.

The Epstein Files Transparency Act provides for the possibility of withholding data that could identify victims, depict child pornography, or compromise ongoing investigations. The text expressly prohibits withholding documents for reasons of embarrassment, reputational damage, or political sensitivity of public figures. This is precisely the point of criticism by some parliamentarians and survivors of Epstein's abuses, who have denounced an inconsistent application of the disclosure criteria: While the identifying details of some victims have remained visible, other parts (including allegations against influential men) are obscured or absent.

For his part, Trump has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing. A White House spokeswoman, Abigail Jackson, stated that the president has been "totally exonerated on any matter related to Epstein". In the past, the Justice Department has called the allegations in the documents 'false and unfounded'.

The woman who filed the complaint later entered into a civil lawsuit against Epstein's estate, only to withdraw it without a court ruling on the merits. The court records do not indicate any financial settlement. In 2021 she was declared ineligible to receive compensation from the fund set up for the financier's victims, but the reason was not made public.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti