The analysis

Ets, so the bill decree breaks a taboo

For the first time, a large EU country is trying to break the mechanism by which the cost of CO₂ embedded in gas-fired generation is automatically passed on in the wholesale price of electricity, generating large intramarginal rents

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

When the Financial Times devotes attention to a national measure on the European electricity market, it means that something relevant is moving. The bill decree with which the government intervenes in the electricity market does indeed break a taboo: for the first time, a large EU country is trying to break the mechanism by which the cost of CO₂ embedded in gas-fired generation is automatically passed on in the wholesale price of electricity, generating large intramarginal rents.

The starting point is well known. In the European model based on the System Marginal Price, when gas-fired combined cycles are the latest technology needed to meet demand, their cost determines the price for all energy produced. Even if gas generates less than half of the electricity, its cost - including CO₂ - ends up setting the price for a much larger share of the market. In this way, the carbon price determined by the Ets is in fact transmitted to the entire electricity price.

Loading...

The decree intervenes in this mechanism by reimbursing thermoelectric producers a part of the CO₂ costs so that they are not fully incorporated into market offers. The aim is to reduce the marginal price and thus the wholesale price of electricity. According to government estimates, the effect could be in the order of EUR 6-9 per megawatt hour.

The political merit of the initiative is that it has made explicit a discussion that had long remained implicit in Europe: the way in which the CO₂ price is transmitted to the electricity market can produce distribution effects that are much broader than originally imagined.

To understand the point, it is necessary to recall the context in which the Ets came into being. At the beginning of the 2000s, the electricity market was dominated by technologies with prevailing operating costs - coal and gas - where the price was mainly determined by variable costs. In an OPEX-driven system, introducing a CO₂ cost was economically consistent: it steered dispatch and incentivised the development of low-emission technologies. It is also thanks to this mechanism that Europe has significantly reduced emissions from the electricity sector over the past two decades.

Today, however, the context is changing rapidly. The system towards which Europe is moving is increasingly based on technologies characterised by high investment costs and very low marginal costs - renewables, storage, grids and in some countries nuclear - i.e. an increasingly CAPEX-driven system. It is no coincidence that the recent reform of European market design promotes instruments such as contracts for difference and long-term power purchase agreements to stabilise the revenues of capital-intensive technologies.

Here the central economic issue emerges. If an increasing share of electricity production is supported by long-term contracts or other revenue stabilisation schemes, continuing to determine the market price through gas-fired combined cycle offers - which fully internalise the cost of CO₂ - risks producing a double economic incentive for technologies already supported by public policies.

Ets is not the problem in itself: the issue is the consistency of incentives with the real availability of technologies to decarbonise the economy.

When CAPEX-driven technologies become prevalent - and in Italy electricity renewables are set to exceed 70 per cent by 2030 - the risk is that the market price will continue to be determined by marginal fossil technologies, generating values that are less and less representative of the real cost structure of the electricity system.

This is why Italy's measure does not represent a definitive solution, but the start of a confrontation that Europe is unlikely to ignore, at a time when Brussels is reviewing the ETS system and the functioning of the energy markets.

Loading...

If electricity is to become the central energy carrier of decarbonisation, it is in the European Commission's own interest that the system evolve towards efficient and sustainable prices for households and businesses.

In recent years, the EU has introduced several instruments to support investment in low-emission technologies: contracts for difference, public procurement programmes and dedicated industrial policies. These are necessary instruments to finance capital-intensive technologies. But if uncoordinated, they risk generating overlaps and inefficient use of resources.

The European Commission itself estimates that the energy transition will require more than EUR 1.5 trillion of additional investment each year in the coming decades. In a scenario of this scale, consistency of instruments becomes an essential condition.

A credible energy transition depends not only on the ambition of climate targets, but also on the ability to guarantee an efficient energy cost for the production system. Without this precondition, it becomes difficult to reconcile decarbonisation with the goal - reaffirmed also by the new European industrial strategies - of bringing industry back to 20 per cent of the Union's GDP.

The real challenge for Brussels is to build an energy system capable of reducing emissions while keeping the European economy competitive.

massimo.beccarello@unimib.it

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti