Letter from von der Leyen

EU, three options for financing Kiev. 71 billion needed by 2026

Brussels proposes subsidies from the member states, an EU-funded credit line through loans on the markets, or a loan linked to frozen Russian assets. But the three options are not mutually exclusive

from our correspondent Beda Romano

La Presidente della Commissione europea Ursula von der Leyen

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

BRUSSELS - The European Commission confirmed yesterday that Ukraine urgently needs fresh money to finance the war against Russia. "The amount of financing needed is significant," the EU executive warned. Three options identified by Brussels are now known. In a 10-page missive sent to the Twenty-Seven, President Ursula von der Leyen notes that the three possibilities are not mutually exclusive, and can be used together.

"We have identified three options: support financed by member states through grants; a credit line financed by the Union through loans on the financial markets; and a loan linked to the cash balances of Russian assets frozen" at the time of the invasion of Ukraine, Ms von der Leyen wrote. In a document attached to the letter, she added that "the three options are not mutually exclusive. They can be combined or sequenced."

Loading...

Brussels refers to the estimates of the International Monetary Fund, which forecasts Ukrainian needs of EUR 135.7 billion in 2026-2027 (of which EUR 71.7 billion next year alone). The document sent to the governments analyses the three options factually, financially and then legally. It was requested by the heads of state and government with the aim of understanding which instrument to use to support Ukraine financially, three and a half years after the Russian invasion of the country.

For some time, the European Commission has considered the use of Russian assets to be the easiest solution to implement, especially as it is less costly for national coffers at a time when European debt is high. Just yesterday, Economy Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis warned that the debt of member countries at an aggregate level is set to rise from 82% in 2024 to 85% of gross domestic product in 2027.

The solution - which would set a historical precedent - does not please Belgium, the country that hosts many of Russia's currency reserves. The Belgian government has expressed doubts and demanded that the member states bear the risks jointly and severally. In this respect, the document prepared yesterday by the European Commission is reassuring. It speaks of the need to adopt 'appropriate safeguards' to ensure the stability of the euro and the financial institutions with which money is deposited.

The European Commission recalls that guarantees have already been adopted against "the enforcement of arbitral awards related to the freezing of Russian assets within the Union". It further specifies: 'In the light of the necessary solidarity between Member States, the guarantees may also have to cover the costs and financial consequences resulting from arbitral awards or other decisions or court proceedings against a Member State arising from the freezing of Russian sovereign assets'.

The idea of using the three options together is interesting. Is this a way to facilitate a compromise between the member states? Or is it merely an element of the factual analysis prepared by the European Commission? According to information gathered here in Brussels, the second possibility would prevail. The EU executive and an important group of member states continue to consider the use of Russian assets as the easiest instrument to help Kiev. The options will now be discussed diplomatically. The more consensual one should be the subject of a formal proposal.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti