European policies

European wine in crisis? Meanwhile, the EU finances South African wineries

The denunciation starts in France and arrives in Italy: while there is a lack of support in Europe, it turns out that the allocation of 15 million in cooperation and development aid

by Giorgio dell'Orefice

Vigneti sull’Etna

2' min read

2' min read

While European wine (andItaly is no exception) is in crisis, the EU Commission finances South African wine within the framework of cooperation and development aid.

The controversy was launched in recent days by the French agricultural organisations, which, struggling with a robust vine grubbing-up plan launched with a view to reducing production, have had their request for EU support to accompany the scrapping of vineyards rejected. The French vignerons therefore literally revolted when they discovered within the framework of cooperation and development aid a EUR 15 million allocation in favour of South African viticulture. 'Is it possible,' they asked, 'that there are no resources for our crisis but there are for the development of South African wines?'

Loading...

South Africa is one of the 'New World' wine countries that, together with New Zealand and Chile, has been competing with European wine on international markets for a little over 20 years now.

The French protest was relaunched in Italy by Filiera Italia. 'It is paradoxical,' commented the CEO of Filiera Italia, Luigi Scordamaglia, 'that while there is talk of reducing the resources of the CAP and promotion programmes, Europe finds funds to allocate to competing supply chains outside the Union. This further undermines Europe's credibility in the eyes of our farmers because of a Brussels technocracy out of touch with political expediency'.

Beyond the amount and agreements dating back years,' they added from Filiera Italia, 'it is completely incomprehensible and unacceptable that the commission should now follow up on such commitments, continuing to allocate public resources to agricultural supply chains in third countries, while European farms are facing a phase of serious difficulty and fundamental tools for ensuring competitiveness and sustainability in the primary sector are being called into question.

The South African case, although traceable to an agreement signed over 20 years ago, highlights the need to re-evaluate today commitments made in a profoundly different context, which risk appearing completely disconnected from the Union's current priorities.
The direction taken by the European Union," they add from Filiera Italia, "seems increasingly evident: significant resources are being allocated to support the agricultural supply chains of third countries, as demonstrated not only by the funds allocated to South Africa, but also the 1.8 billion euro announced for agriculture in the Mercosur countries which, thanks to the agreement strongly supported by Von der Leyen, will compete unfairly with our production and put the health of European citizens at risk. All this against a backdrop of great uncertainty about the future of the CAP and promotion programmes.

And strong criticism of the Brussels initiative also came from the Italian producers of the Sicilian Consortium of Etna Doc. 
'Financing the South African wine industry,' commented the president of Etna Doc, Francesco Cambria, 'means weakening our own. It is a short-sighted and self-defeating vision. European Denominations do not ask for privileges, but for consistency. It is unacceptable that the very people who should be defending our products, our rural communities, and our excellence, should choose to support external economies in such a strategic and identifying sector'.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti