Venice 82

Venice 2025: monsters at the exhibition, but not masterpieces

Good Sorrentino, Lanthimos and Del Toro. Baumbach's 'Jay Kelly' is forgettable. A revelation awaits

The Voice of Hind Rajab di Kaouther Ben Hania

6' min read

6' min read

A magical effect of the Venice Film Festival is the queue - this year thicker than in previous years - fighting to get inside a cinema, when in the rest of the year, in Italy at least, you have to scramble to throw spectators inside. The cinema is, therefore, still alive, even if it is only a means to attend an event, to watch a film alongside a director or a cast, or to breathe a little stardust. It is alive if a herd of cinephiles allow themselves to be lashed unmoved by rain and wind, at the risk of being electrocuted, to see a (forgettable) film with Julia Roberts. It is alive, since the Biennale wanted to start with a film, La grazia, promoting the euthanasia law still neglected by Italian politics. And it is alive, since the pro-Palestine procession decided to parade here yesterday - and not in Rome or Milan - and use the media showcase to shout the word genocide. In a politically significant context, it lacked, however - at least in this first part of the competition and the out-of-competition - the urgency of cinematic experimentation.

"The Grace" by Paolo Sorrentino

Paolo Sorrentino's inaugural film (La grazia, in fact) is remarkable and one wishes him all the luck he deserves. It is a work of depth that combines the Oscar winner's established directorial technique - the tracking shots and camera movements that are his hallmark - with a subject of civil commitment. A servant of the State, a President of the Republic (Toni Servillo), is grappling with the limits of law and of himself as a man on issues that cut the country in two, such as deciding on a condemned man's request for pardon or on the end of life. That is, the demand to be accompanied by the law when it becomes unbearable.

Loading...

"Whose are our days?" asks the president's daughter, Dorotea (Anna Ferzetti), to her father, summarising the ethical and legal dilemma. Bravissima Ferzetti, who faces a Toni Servillo, compos sui pannières of those who must disguise themselves behind an institution even in their private weaknesses. It matters little that there are baroque moments in the film: the storm sweeping over the visiting president of the Portuguese Republic or the rasta pope, black, on a motorbike; and certain metaphorical redundancies, such as the dying horse in the Quirinale stables.

This is part of Sorrentini's 'grace' and, as such, should be enjoyed. But there is nothing to be said about the courage to express an idea very strongly, as he did in Il divo, about Andreotti, and in the disappeared from all screens Them, about Berlusconi. This strength is seasoned with an excellent script (even in the less credible prison interviews), with stretches of grotesque and comic flavour, in the tradition of Italian comedy. The figure of Coco, the president's friend, has a strong voice that is destined to stay, both because of Milvia Marigliano's acting and because of the icastic lines that the actress channels while maintaining comic timing and aplomb. "This is dinner hypothesis!" she exclaims, looking at the frugal food on her plate. The grace is not free of a certain sweetness either, with which she covers the fallacy of our human skin, its inclination to resentment, to doubt, as a vice, but also as a gift for reflection.Sorrentino has taken a stand, but stylistically he has not done something unusual.

Bugonia by Yorghos Lanthimos

Just as Yorghos Lanthimos did not in Bugonia, a sci-fi about the conspiratorial madness of that part of the United States adrift. Lanthimos takes us into the paranoia of Teddy (Jesse Plemons), one of the many Americans left behind by the absence of an inclusive social policy. Teddy, together with a cousin with cognitive deficits (Aidan Delbis), which however do not affect his kindness, kidnaps Emma Stone, whom Teddy considers an alien hiding in the guise of the CEO of a multinational company. The writing is taut and the direction always up to the twists and turns, the farcical violence and the grotesque, but rooted in a reality of social malaise in an America that has no qualms about drowning the weakest. In support, there is the well-oiled team of actors - Stone and Plemons, first and foremost - whose affinity for black humour and professional performance always verges on perfection. The film is good, it manages to make an impact even though it is a remake of a 2003 South Korean film, Jigureul jikyeora! by Jang Joon-hwan. But it lacks the awe and magnitude that had shaken the Lido theatre with Poor Creatures!

No other choice by Park Chan-wook

Keeping in close geographical proximity, here is the Korean No other choice by Park Chan-wook about the descent to hell of a man who loses his job in an environment that pushes him with his back to the wall, 'with no choice' to run to eliminate the competition. Park Chan-wook never ceases to entertain the spectator with cinema-cinema, as he did with the cult Oldboy. And, after all, even in No Other Choice imprisonment is always mentioned, whether physical or mental. But Oldboy was made in 2003 and what shocked then, today does not raise an eyebrow, and on the theme of social vindication, fellow countryman Bong Joon Ho has already excelled portentously with Parasite, which, thanks to a grotesque delicacy and a note of singularity and flair, took home a few Oscars.

À pied d'œuvre by Valérie Donzelli

Work is always spoken of in À pied d'œuvre by Valérie Donzelli, but in a discourse focused above all on the dignity and value of an idea for which we are prepared to sacrifice our established place in the world. Paul (Bastien Bouillon) is a successful photographer who gives up fame to become a writer. His books are well reviewed, but sell poorly and so he is forced to take physical work, selling his labour on the cheap. Paul never protests at the unfairness and baseness of certain counterparts. He endures the indignity of scorn and incomprehension from family and friends, without the bohemian rhetoric of the artist who has to suffer to be one. Based on the novel of the same name by Franck Courtès, this film is about radicalism, about integrity in the face of a choice. In this sense, it is a daring film about sought-after precariousness, which remains delicate, tenacious and credible also because of that sincere hunger to say that director Donzelli has in her background as a provincial girl, willing for the love of cinema to do as many jobs as Paul. The direction, however, cannot be called daring.

Frankenstein by Guillermo Del Toro

Then there is Guillermo Del Toro's Frankenstein which is truly the work of a master. This is immediately apparent from the first shots on the Arctic ice, where a ship has run aground: the colours of blue and azure have the fairy-tale secret of the best of picture books. It is, as the title suggests, an adaptation of Mary Shelley's masterpiece and speaks of the hybris of a certain kind of science that only brings death, or worse, condemnation to immortality. The pathos, the rawness, the compassion are rendered with a touch that suggests a divine creativity even in the recesses and leads to constant pleasure for the eye. But, while beautiful, this film tells us nothing new compared to The Shape of Water, which won the Golden Lion on the Lido in 2017 and, subsequently, four Oscars. Del Toro is unlikely to return to the Venetian palmares, but his film will most likely end up on the L.A. shortlist (hopefully for Mia Goth's poignant Elisabeth).

Noah Baumbach with Jay Kelly

No one knows what has got into Noah Baumbach with Jay Kelly. The director, who has always navigated well on the terrain of family earthquakes, now offers a retracted version of the actor's loneliness with a string of banal clichés about Italy, in which only George Clooney's acting is saved. To put it in competition: inauditu.

After the hunt by Guadagnino

Finally, Guadagnino guaranteed Julia Roberts' premiere in Venice, but Aafter the hunt, which stars her, slips into a parody of what the American upper class should be: a huddle of people listening to fancy music and discussing Heidegger and Hannah Arendt as if they were talking about cooking recipes. It's a shame, because it has some interesting insights into the thin cages produced by certain woke culture. Something offbeat is to be expected from Assayas's The Wizard of the Kremlin, with a Jude Law in the pictures really looking like Putin. And from Kaouther ben Hania's The voice of Hind Rajab, the Biennale's pro-Pal response to movements calling for a stance on Gaza. Let's hope so, otherwise goodbye to the term Mostra, which applies to those who cross arts, challenge, risk. Back to the banal festival.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti