Family businesses and start-ups, a marriage for innovation
In the USA 3 out of 10 corporate venture capital from family businesses, in Germany five times more than here. An opportunity for new technologies
4' min read
Key points
- Geographical and industry proximity the US recipe
- Corporate venture capital is growing in Italy, but less than in Europe
- The Danish case, patents grow
4' min read
(IlSole24Ore-Radiocor) - The tradition and territorial roots of family businesses and the vocation for innovation of start-ups. A marriage that is not always easy but which, with generational change accelerating, could be the key to Italian SMEs catching the train of change that can no longer be postponed. And, at the same time, an opportunity for new initiatives to last. A Bocconi University study relaunches the theme and puts new data on the table.
The American Lesson
In the spotlight is the US market, where almost 30% of corporate venture capital transactions from 2000 to 2017 originated from family businesses. So much so that family-owned VCs accounted for a total of €12 billion in the US, compared to non-family-owned VC transactions amounting to €20.9 billion. Figures that well underline how overseas the taboo is now behind us, points out Mario Daniele Amore, lecturer in the Department of Management & Technology, among the authors of the study, "which shows that it is possible to avoid natural reluctance in companies with a long tradition".
There are two winning chapters in the American lesson: territorial proximity and contiguity of the investment sector. In short, proximity. That element that allows businesses led by an entrepreneurial family to have more control and, at the same time, integrate innovation into the process. 'Investing in start-ups is inherently risky, especially in the early stages; consequently, the allocation of venture capital funds is subject to moral hazard risks,' explains Amore. An attitude that is difficult to reconcile with long-standing family businesses, according to "the view that family investors try to minimise risk in their corporate venture capital activities. In the US scenario, we find that family VC portfolios, however, are more likely to include ventures that operate in the parent organisation's core industry and are geographically closer to it'.
This is precisely the key: 'geographical proximity to portfolio companies reduces moral hazard, facilitating monitoring and improving the exchange of information'. A two-way advantage considering that 'companies financed by family cv are more likely to make a successful exit,' Mario Daniele Amore further explains.
In addition to this, companies led by family CEOs tend to invest in companies with founders who have a strong academic and entrepreneurial background, such as Ivy League degrees or previous start-up experience. As a result, according to the Bocconi professor, "startups backed by family businesses are more likely to be successful. Even after taking into account factors such as syndication, venture experience, and investor reputation, companies backed by family-owned VCs have consistently performed better financially than their non-family-backed counterparts'.

