Chiara Ferragni acquitted on Pandorogate: the scam is extinct
Since the aggravating circumstance of misleading consumers has been dropped, the offence of simple fraud is inadmissible and has been declared extinct
Key points
- What were the three possible conclusions of the Ferragni case
- Ferragni in court for the verdict: calm and confident
- Defence: no malice, at most misleading advertising
- Restitutions already enforced in the competent fora
- Restitutions already enforced in the competent fora
- The judge did not recognise the aggravating circumstance, acquittal by extinction of the crime
- Also dismissed Fabio Damato and Francesco Cannillo
On 14 January 2026, the Court of Milan exonerated Chiara Ferragni from the charge of aggravated fraud for more than EUR 2 million in the Pandorogate affair linked to the charity and the sales of Balocco's 'Pandoro Pink Christmas' at Christmas 2022 and of the Easter Eggs '21-'22 by Dolci Preziosi.
The sentence of not proceeding was read by Judge Ilio Mannucci Pacini. The aggravating circumstance of consumers being 'misled' ('minor defence'), which the Milan Public Prosecutor's Office had considered to be so in the 'way the message was conveyed' on the web 'where Ferragni enjoyed undisputed credibility', fell.
The offence of simple fraud, unlike aggravated fraud which is prosecutable ex officio, is unfeasible and was extinguished following the compensation (EUR 150 per person) paid by the businesswoman to the consumer associations Codacons, Assourt and Consumatori Italiani and the withdrawal of the lawsuits following agreements.
The three possible conclusions of the Ferragni case
The request for conviction submitted on 25 November 2025 by Milan's deputy public prosecutor, Eugenio Fusco, was one year and eight months for the influencer was, Fusco had coordinated the investigation by the Guardia di Finanza together with substitute Cristian Barilli.
Three paths were open to the president of the third criminal section of the Court of Milan.

