The fight against the black economy

Tax authorities: a surge in audits in 2025. Here’s how tax evaders end up in the crosshairs

The Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF) before the Chamber of Deputies’ Finance Committee: tax audits have increased by 18% compared with 2024. Analysis of the data to identify those most at risk. Strengthening the link between tax audits and revenue recovery

by Marco Mobili and Giovanni Parente

 ARAMYAN - stock.adobe.com

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Over 223,000 audits in 2025, representing an 18% increase on the previous year (almost 34,000 more), of which over 11% relate to individuals with VAT registration numbers. The Ministry of the Economy has provided these figures in detail, citing data contained in the report by the Court of Auditors in the General State Accounts, in response to a question tabled during Question Time in the Chamber of Deputies’ Finance Committee by the Five Star Movement (first signatory Enrica Alifano, read out by Angela Raffa).

‘This trend,’ explains the response read out by Under-Secretary Lucia Albano, ‘confirms the effectiveness of the measures adopted and suggests that high levels of inspection activity will be maintained in the coming years as well, starting in 2026.’

Loading...

Identifying taxpayers at highest risk of tax evasion

The response does not merely focus on the recent past but also sets out a course for the near future, based on the premise that ‘the need to step up enforcement efforts remains a priority in the Government’s strategy’. To this end, ‘over the coming years, the tax information system and the interoperability of databases will be enhanced, including through the use of artificial intelligence tools’.

Of course – as Vincenzo Carbone, Director of the Revenue Agency, has already emphasised on several occasions – there will never be any tax assessments carried out using artificial intelligence; it will simply be a tool to support the Agency’s staff. Human guidance and supervision will therefore remain central to the entire audit process.

Increasingly targeted checks

As explained in the MEF’s response, ‘models for analysing the risk of tax evasion and fraud will be further developed, making greater use of advanced data analysis techniques, with a view to improving the ability to identify the most critical issues and making audits more targeted and effective, whilst reducing the burden on taxpayers and the risk of identifying non-material cases’. Not only because the link between control activities and revenue recovery will be strengthened, with a view to increasing the actual capacity for revenue collection and maximising the overall impact of administrative action.

The role of selection

With regard to the relationship between the number of audits and the total number ofVAT numbers, the Italian Revenue Agency has, in recent years, ‘has focused its efforts – as clarified in the Ministry of Economy and Finance’s response – on an increasingly targeted selection of taxpayers characterised by high risk indicators, thanks in part to the implementation of advanced data analysis tools’.

This approach “enables us to strengthen, in a targeted manner, efforts to combat tax evasion, by making tax audits more effective and reducing the impact on taxpayers who comply with tax regulations’”. Indeed, as the Ministry of Economy further emphasises, ‘effective action to combating tax evasion, must maximise the risk of an audit for those who show signs of breaching tax legislation, whilst minimising the likelihood of subjecting those who have correctly fulfilled their obligations to an investigation, as this would result in a wasteful expenditure of public resources’.

Combating tax evasion

Furthermore, as *L’Economia* goes on to explain, ‘to determine the rate of coverage of tax evasion, it does not appear sufficient to divide the number of audits by the target population, as this would only be correct if one were to assume that all taxpayers present tax risk profiles’.

It should also be noted that ‘the number of checks must be assessed within the broader context of the measures put in place to safeguard public finances, bearing in mind that automated checks on tax returns essentially cover 100 per cent of taxpayers and that, in addition to post-filing checks, various types of pre-filing checks are carried out’.

Payment of informal notices

The question raised by the M5S also sought clarification on the fact that 14 per cent of the amounts claimed via informal notices is paid by taxpayers, interpreting this as a ‘sign of a tendency to defer payments whilst awaiting tax amnesties’. On this point, the Ministry of the Economy clarifies that the ‘14 per cent paid by taxpayers in relation to notices of irregularities concerning the 2020–2022 tax returns does not appear significant, as a considerable proportion of the amounts claimed through these notices is paid by taxpayers via instalment plans, which are still ongoing. It should also be borne in mind that a large proportion of the sums claimed in these notices (approximately 59 per cent) is collected through entry on the tax roll’, and these amounts are also paid to the Revenue Agency for Collection (Ader) via instalment payments made by taxpayers. In essence, this is a ‘snapshot of a dynamic process that is constantly evolving over time’.

Copyright reserved ©

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti