The measure in the budget

Flat tax, inequality under scrutiny: savings of up to 23,000 euros for VAT-registered individuals

The hearings have highlighted differences in treatment, but the League is on the defensive

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The hearings on the budget have highlighted several issues regarding the increase in the revenue or remuneration threshold to 100,000 euros for the flat-rate tax scheme for VAT-registered individuals. Yesterday, too, there were repeated references to the potential distortions caused by the flat-rate scheme. According to the figures provided by the UPB, remaining in the preferential income tax regime rather than switching to the standard IRPEF regime could lead to savings of up to 23,000 euros.

Reports from Upb and Bankitalia

With a further point for consideration put to MPs and senators: ‘The tax disparity,’ notes the UPB, ‘may also encourage the conversion of employment relationships into self-employed contracts with VAT registration, resulting in lower costs for the client and reduced protection and social security cover for the worker.’

Loading...

The Bank of Italia has also highlighted these potential areas of concern. Andrea Brandolini, head of the Economics and Statistics Department at Via Nazionale, pointed out that the preferential tax regime for VAT-registered individuals results in ‘disparities in the tax burden of taxpayers with the same ability to pay’.

The widening gap amid high inflation

However, there are a number of specific aspects that emerge from the Bank of Italia’s analysis: ‘In the context of relatively high inflation, the difference in treatment between taxpayers who opt into this scheme and those subject to the progressive IRPEF tax system tends to become more pronounced as a result of fiscal drag, which affects the latter but not the former.’

Disincentive to growth in size

The other factor highlighted concerns the disincentive to scaling up: ‘Tax and regulatory regimes that differ according to company size aim to reduce the burdens on smaller firms: whilst they may encourage their establishment and survival in the early stages, they may also discourage their growth beyond certain size thresholds’. According to Palazzo Koch, this effect is consistent with ‘the concentration of sole traders observed near the threshold for application’ of the flat-rate scheme.

The League’s defence

The League, through its budget bill rapporteur Alberto Gusmeroli, is defending the flat-rate scheme and the extension of the revenue or remuneration threshold: ‘You cannot analyse a system solely on the basis of the tax burden’. The chair of the Chamber of Deputies’ Committee on Productive Activities, currently seconded to the Budget Committee, points out that the self-employed must bear the full cost of social security contributions and cannot deduct expenses:

“It is a gross oversimplification to say that everything revolves around a 15 per cent flat tax for one group and a progressive tax for the other, because we would need to analyse net income on a case-by-case basis – that is, what ultimately remains for the employee and the self-employed person,” added Gusmeroli, noting that “this is a simplification that is often repeated by the opposition”.

The latest figures on enrolment in the flat-rate scheme

Meanwhile, the flat-rate scheme continues to attract new sign-ups. Figures for the third quarter (July, August, September) of the year, released by the Ministry of Finance’s VAT Register Observatory, show that over 49,000 businesses (51 per cent of the total) opted for the flat-rate scheme when registering.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti