In Europe

Foreign interference: Fdi and the League vote alongside Vannacci and the M5S against the creation of a European centre

The motion, which cites Russia as the main ‘hostile actor’, was passed with the votes of Forza Italia, the PD, the Greens and Azione. Calenda takes a dig at Crosetto over the fight against hybrid warfare

 (EPA)

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

An unprecedented alliance between Fdi, the League and Futuro Nazionale has emerged in the European Parliament on the sensitive issue of relations with Russia: according to the voting records, the delegations from Meloni’s party, the Lega and Vannacchio’s party, together with the Five Star Movement, voted against the opinion on the resolution calling for the establishment within the Democratic Shield of a European Centre to combat disinformation and foreign interference.

EU-NATO tensions at the borders

The bill was passed with votes in favour from Forza Italia, the PD, the Greens and Azione, whilst Sinistra Italiana abstained. All this on the very day that tensions between NATO and Russia escalated in the skies over the Baltic, with two Italian Eurofighters taking to the air to shoot down a drone in Lithuania, and on which a Russian frigate fired two signal rockets in international waters off the coast of Denmark, narrowly missing a Danish military helicopter.

Loading...

The dossier divides the camps

More specifically, the ECR Group (along with Fratelli d’Italia), the Patriots (along with the Lega) and Europe of Sovereign Nations (along with Futuro Nazionale) voted against the report. The Left group, on the other hand, was split into three: the Finnish and Swedish delegations voted in favour, whilst the Italian members of the M5S voted against, alongside the French members and the majority of the group; the two representatives from Sinistra Italiana and five other MEPs abstained.

The text recognises Russia as a ‘hostile actor’

The text therefore divides both the centre-right and the broader political spectrum. It reveals how the issue of relations with Putin’s Russia – identified in the opinion as the main external threat to European democracy – is one of the most thorny issues for both political camps in Italia. ‘The key hostile actor is Russia,’ said the rapporteur Tomas Tobé (EPP) in no uncertain terms. ‘Russia is waging systematic campaigns against European democracies’, with the aim of ‘dividing and weakening Europe’. The text highlights frequent hybrid attacks against critical infrastructure (which it also identifies as including electoral infrastructure), physical sabotage, arson, espionage and signal jamming, as well as similar activities originating from Belarus, China, Iran and North Korea.

Salvini’s signals in Moscow

It certainly comes as no surprise that Futuro Nazionale and the M5S have taken an opposing stance, given General Vannacci’s well-known pro-Russian stance and the hostility expressed by Giuseppe Conte towards the war in Ukraine. Nor is the opposition of the Lega surprising, as it is the party within the government closest to Moscow and the most hostile to supporting Kyiv (even though it has never failed to cast its votes in favour in Parliament): just the day before the vote, the leader of the Carroccio, Matteo Salvini, met with Italian businesspeople operating in Moscow, emphasising that Italia can play an important role in bringing the conflict to an end and expressing his confidence that purchases of Russian gas could resume as soon as the war is over.

Praise from the Kremlin

The meeting in Milan “marks the beginning of a return by the Italian establishment to realism, pragmatism and common sense”, was the praise offered by Russian Ambassador Paramonov, who called on “other senior government figures” to take the same view. However, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Pesko struck a cautious note on the gas issue: “We need to assess whether these supplies are viable and whether we can guarantee the necessary volumes, given that many volumes have already been diverted to alternative destinations. If these two conditions are met, then it is certainly possible to discuss the matter.”

Fdi returns to sovereignty

With regard to the European resolution, the most unexpected move came from Fdi, which until now had not hesitated to support Kyiv. “We are the first to oppose any form of foreign interference – even that of the European Union itself – in national elections,” explained MEP Stefano Cavedagna. “Establishing a Centre for the Democratic Resilience of Member States in Brussels is an infringement of national sovereignty, a dangerous drift: we do not want a European authority that ends up dictating what is democratically acceptable in individual Member States, nor an EU apparatus that could become a tool for exerting political pressure on national governments that Brussels disapproves of”.

Cavedagna fears that, in this election year in Italia, Spain and France, someone might try to portray the conservative forces that ‘are on the rise everywhere’ as ‘unpresentable’: ‘Sovereignty,’ he emphasises, ‘belongs to nations and citizens and must not be violated’.

Calenda attacks Crosetto

Fdi’s vote against the motion came at the very same time as Defence Minister Guido Crosetto was on a scheduled trip to Bulgaria, Poland, Lithuania and then Latvia ‘to consolidate the idea of building a continental Europe of defence’, as he himself explained. “We must also work together on the future of defence: integrated air defence, space, artificial intelligence, unmanned and robotic systems, countering hybrid threats, military mobility and industrial cooperation.” But Carlo Calenda of Azione takes a dig at him: “I say to Minister Crosetto, who rightly points out that we are not doing much in the face of the hybrid war Russia is waging against us via social media or by supporting pro-Russian political parties, that Azione tabled a bill two years ago called the ‘‘Democratic Shield’’, which was passed today in the European Parliament, with Fratelli d’Italia voting against it. So they need to get a move on, because the upcoming elections will be completely tainted by the 3 billion that Russia is spending on propaganda abroad.”

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti