Taranto

Ex Ilva, blockade avoided: TAR suspends mayor's order on power plant stop

The first citizen had ordered the plant to stop within 30 days for environmental reasons. The Court: the matter should be investigated first. Hearing on 19 May

by Domenico Palmiotti

TARANTO-ARCELORMITTAL EX ILVA, GLI IMPIANTI  ACCIAIERIA ACCIAIERIE  IMPIANTO SIDERURGICO  SIDERURGIA  ARCELOR MITTAL IMAGOECONOMICA

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The Taranto plant of Acciaierie d'Italia in extraordinary administration, former Ilva, dodges the risk of having to shut down from 13 May following the order of the mayor of Taranto, Piero Bitetti, who had imposed a 30-day shutdown of the thermoelectric power plant that feeds the factory by processing blast furnace gases. The Lecce Tar - as requested by the company's lawyers - has in fact suspended the mayor's order. "The proposed issues need to be examined in depth by the collegiate panel," while in the meantime "it appears appropriate to safeguard the state of affairs existing to date, also in order to allow the decisional phase to take place," wrote the president of the Lecce Tar, Antonio Pasca. The administrative court therefore ordered 'the collegial treatment in council chamber on 19 May 2026'.

The company had highlighted the prospect of setbacks

The mayor, in his order of the past few days, had justified the halt to the plant by the fact that AdI Energia is still 'in default with regard to the presentation of the reduction plan for the non-carcinogenic risk of arsenic, cobalt, and nickel emission parameters'. 'This is a very bad signal for anyone who wants to relaunch the plant,' commented Adolfo Urso, Minister of Enterprise. 'We hope that this decision will not compromise the continuity of production at the plant.

Loading...

And in fact, upon receipt of the order, company sources had observed that with the shutdown of the plant it would no longer be possible to recover and manage the gases of the steelmaking cycle, which, as they cannot even be flared, remain without any possibility of disposal. Under these conditions, therefore, AdI had pointed out, the production cycle cannot continue and the impossibility of managing the gases of the steel cycle means, as a consequence of the order, the shutdown of the hot area, heart of the Taranto plant. All this, moreover, with an open negotiation for the sale of the company with two potential investors: the American fund Flacks Group and Jindal Steel International.

Mayor: but we are no longer a land of sacrifice

For his part, Mayor Bitetti gave the following reasons for the order: 'I appreciate the attention of Minister Urso, a person who devotes a lot of effort to resolving disputes at a national level, but we cannot ignore the fact that this is no longer a land of sacrifice. As long as I am mayor for this land, which gives me honours and burdens, perhaps more burdens at this time, we can no longer think that a power plant will not present a plan to prove that there is no pollution. This no longer exists'.

In the appeal filed with the Regional Administrative Court on 24 April, AdI Energia's attorneys, Marco Annoni and Luisa Torchia, had pointed out that "as of 13 May 2026, AdI Energia will be obliged to suspend the operation of the plant" and therefore asked the Administrative Court to order "the reduction to half of the terms for setting hearings and council chambers in order to allow the precautionary petition to be dealt with by the panel before the date of the suspension of operations".

Company lawyers: the national Hague applies

Moreover, in their appeal to the Regional Administrative Court, the company's lawyers had written, among other things, that Bitetti's ordinance derives from a regional council resolution of 2025 and the relative warning (fulfilments linked to the Health Damage Assessment), which are acts already challenged in the Regional Administrative Court. And therefore, for the company, for the ordinance there is already an 'illegitimacy derived from the illegitimacy of the preliminary acts'.

For the lawyers, 'it is not doubtful that by evoking regional law 21/2012' and the assessment of health damage, 'the mayor of Taranto considered that they could also apply to plants subject to the national AIA, superimposing and substituting the health and environmental assessments made at the regional level on the conditions for the operation of the plant with those established by the competent national authority, again for the protection of health and the environment, for the conditions of operation of the plant. In doing so, however, it blatantly disregarded the provisions of Article 6(9) of the regional law'.

The latter says that for establishments subject to a national environmental impact assessment - and the power plant falls within it - the health damage assessment adopted under the regional law 'constitutes only an element that can be used exclusively within the broader ministerial inquiry procedure for the re-examination of the national environmental impact assessment, but cannot constitute a prerequisite for the mayor to exercise powers that the national law does not contemplate and that are reserved exclusively to the competent national authority', the Ministry of the Environment.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti