The budget

From missiles to armoured vehicles, from fighters to helicopters: 41% of industry funds go to Defence

Almost half of the Mimit budget to 2028 for the development of frigates, fighter jets, helicopters: 10.3 billion out of 25.1. Weighing down the decline in cars, steel and traditional sectors

by Carmine Fotina

(Imagoeconomica)

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Missiles, fighters, helicopters, frigates, armoured vehicles. One has to delve into dozens of tables of public accounting documents to discover that the ministry responsible for industry is the real privileged channel for financing defence investments, starting with those made in the context of Italy's participation in NATO.

The annexes to the draft budget law now before Parliament, cross-referenced with those of the latest Documento programmatico di finanza pubblica (Dpfp), carve out figures accurate to the decimal point: in the three-year period 2026-2028, defence will absorb 40.9% of the budget of the Ministry of Enterprise and Industry, EUR 10.29 billion out of a total of EUR 25.16 billion.

Loading...

The Dpfp explains the relevance of the sector as follows: 'In order to contribute to the strengthening of the European defence capability and the consolidation of the European pillar of NATO, Italy is taking an active role in increasing defence investment, enhancing industrial integration and supporting joint research and development programmes. Awareness in this field is constantly growing, as shown by the conclusions of the NATO Summit held in June in The Hague in June 2025, from which emerged the commitment to increase defence spending, with a target of 5% in relation to GDP by 2035, divided into 3.5% to finance core defence capabilities and 1.5% for security-related activities, including, by way of example, innovation and strengthening the industrial base.

Some changes of an almost structural nature, however, cannot be considered recent, and the trend of Italian industry must be re-read, which in recent decades has lost its vocation in sectors such as information technology and telecommunications, has been severely downsized in others, such as household appliances, and is experiencing a deep crisis in what were once two areas of excellence, the automotive and steel industries. An indirect consequence is also the transformation of the map of industrial policies and the incentive system, affected by interventions that are sometimes discontinuous or modified year after year, and perennially conditioned by the identification of financial coverage, as the latest events of the Transition 4.0 and 5.0 plans paradigmatically demonstrate.

In the meantime, the budget of the ministry representing the interests of industry seems to have become an ideal vehicle for financing defence investments, in which Italy counts on international players such as Leonardo and Fincantieri. This is not a novelty of the Meloni government or of the last manoeuvre, but only since this year has the document 'Nota illustrativa sulle leggi pluriennali di spesa in conto capitale' attached to the Dpfp (which replaced the old Nadef) made it possible to make a proportion of the total budget.

The 'National Defence Interventions' programme alone is worth just under EUR 9.2 billion over the three-year period, practically as much as the 'Production System Incentives' programme, which, to give a few examples, contains development contracts (EUR 2 billion over the three-year period), Plan 4.0 tax credits (EUR 1.4 billion), the New Sabatini (EUR 1.3 billion), Ipcei (research projects of common European interest, EUR 850 million), and innovation agreements (EUR 300 million). Defence also has a share of EUR 1.1 billion, also over the three-year period, for research and development projects in the aeronautics industry, a share of the programme 'Industrial policies, for competitiveness, Italian-made products, and business crisis management'.

The individual tables provide details of the three-year resources, supplemented by coverage from 2028 onwards. These are multi-year funds, authorised by previous laws, which include, the MEF documents state, interventions carried out 'in the context of participation in NATO, the European Union or the Organisation for Joint Armament Cooperation (OCCAR)'.

With more than 7.3 billion, for example, from Laws 266/1997, 266/2005, 232/2016, 205/2017, 145/2018 and 160/2019, the development and acquisition of the Eurofighter Typhoon fighter aircraft and that of the Fremm-class naval units are financed; the development of the Aster 30 Block 1 NT missile and the FSAF PAAMS anti-aircraft and missile defence system, the Sicral 3 aerospace programme, the M-346 training aircraft, the NH90 helicopter and the escort exploration helicopter (NEES), the MBDA TESEO MK/2E heavy anti-ship missile, the development and acquisition of the VBM 8x8-Freccia armoured vehicles, the New Blindo Centauro II, the development of equipment for search and rescue in hostile environments (Combat/SAR).

From the 2013 Stability Law, on the other hand, derives the multi-year authorisation (EUR 555 million for the last three years) for the acquisition of transport and landing (LHD) units, six multi-purpose offshore patrol vessels, a logistic support unit and two ultra-high-speed units, as well as operational units under the Defence Maritime Capability Protection Naval Programme and units for the Near Future Submarine project. Law No. 808/1985 finances dual-use investments in the Air Force; the 2007 Budget Law is the original source from which the expenditure for the modernisation of the Tornado IDS and ECR vehicles is derived; while the expenditure authorisation for the M-345 trainer aircraft is linked to Decree No. 321/1996.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti