NRP aid boosts quality in scientific research
Thanks to investments in the last four years, Italy is second in terms of increased publications behind China
4' min read
Key points
4' min read
There is constant reflection in the research world on how to evaluate investments, often predominantly public. The National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRP), financed by the Recovery Fund, is no exception. Four years after its launch, while the systemic effects of this extraordinary injection of public resources are being questioned, the first measurable signs are emerging. And it is not, for Italian researchers, so much the quantity of scientific publications that is changing as much as, and perhaps more importantly, their quality.
To measure the latter, an increasingly used indicator is the Nature Index count, which records the number of articles published in some 140 scientific journals of very high impact, awarding one point to the country with at least one co-author in the article. It is a crude measure, but one that allows an international comparison between national research systems.
The evidence of numbers
.Analysing the data over the period 2015-2024 for countries such as the United States, Germany, France, Italy and China (see graph opposite), one fact emerges clearly: China shows almost exponential growth, testifying to a structured strategy of scientific strengthening. Western countries, on the contrary, show stable or moderately growing trends. In this context, Italy is a positive exception. After a phase of substantial stagnation between 2015 and 2020, there has been a sharp rise since 2021: Italy's Nature Index count has grown by around 40% in the last four years, a rate significantly higher than France and Germany and second only to China. Among European countries, only Romania and Greece, also beneficiaries of substantial funds from Recovery, show a positive dynamic, albeit on smaller volumes than Italy.
This figure suggests that the NRP, despite having a broader mission, is making a real contribution to the production of high-quality publications, almost as an indirect or induced effect. It is worth recalling that the Plan has dedicated one of its six missions precisely to universities and research, allocating some EUR 17 billion to R&D, more than half of which directly to universities and public bodies. A not insignificant part was also directed to technology transfer and tax incentives for business innovation.
The post Pnrr
.The observed result is even more interesting if one considers that the NRP required a paradigm shift from the institutions. It was not just a matter of disbursing funds, but of experimenting with new organisational models - just think of the hub & spoke system, designed to aggregate critical masses of researchers on strategic themes - and a more competitive and coordinated planning, with intermediate and final deadlines and objectives. An approach closer, in some ways, to that of the major European programmes.
Brand connect
Newsletter Scuola+
La newsletter premium dedicata al mondo della scuola con approfondimenti normativi, analisi e guide operative
Abbonati
