Garlasco, why the Milan public prosecutor's office excluded Sempio as the author of Chiara Poggi's murder

The document lists the elements that led to Stasi's conviction in the bis appeal, in which the prosecution was represented by Deputy Prosecutor Laura Barbaini. Verdict confirmed by the Court of Cassation.

The public prosecutor's office reported to the Pavia prosecutors that "Stasi has always operated in such a way as to condition the interventions and non-interventions of the investigators of the time and of the judicial authority" and even "in the present day" continues to do so.

The Milanese magistrates point out that 'the data concerning Sempio, starting from the conversations of 7 and 8 August 2007', i.e. his phone calls to Poggi's house, also considered suspicious in the new investigation on the friend of Chiara's brother, up to 'the receipt of the car park in Vigevano, are already indicated in the same words in the defence statement' of 3 December 2014 in the appeal bis.

The Milan Public Prosecutor's Office also speaks of 'information that has already been examined and judged to be totally irrelevant' and 'unsuitable to allow the registration' of Sempio, who was investigated by the Pavia prosecutors and then dismissed by the gip.

The Prosecutor further writes that Marco Poggi's historical friend 'is denounced by the private investigation company, through a moca and erroneous reading of the trial data'.

By way of example only,' reads the memo, 'the Tim cells tapped by the phones of Sempio's friends on the morning of 13 August 2007 are disregarded, in order to claim, in a manner inconsistent with their statements, that Roberto Freddi and Mattia Capra at about 10 a.m.' were 'already far from Garlasco, suggesting that they were involved in obscure activities in support of Sempio'.

The 'previous judges have already evaluated this information', it goes on to say, 'considering itto be unrelated to the procedural findings'.

Chiara's 'life, her acquaintances, her family environment', writes the Prosecutor, take away 'all rationality and practical plausibility from the alternative version of her brother's friend' as a possible killer.

On that 7 and 8 August Sempio 'called the Poggi house phone in search of his brother'. There is a 'total evidential vacuum' about any contact between the two.

The Prosecutor also refers to the 'systematic elimination of key sources of evidence' on Stasi by the then commander of the Garlasco carabinieri, 'marshal Marchetto'.

For the Milan public prosecutor's office - in a 'memo' seen by LaPresse - an 'exhaustive analysis' of Chiara's 'life, her acquaintances, her family environment removes all rationality and practical plausibility from the alternative version of her brother's friend as the possible author of the murder'. Sempio 'does not appear to have played any role, nor does he appear to have ever had any place in Chiara Poggi's life, also given the significant age difference': at the time of the crime, she was 26 years old and he was 19 years old,