Google, Agcom takes AI search to the EU Commission
After Fieg complaint, the Authority reports AI Overviews and AI Mode to Brussels: pluralism, newspaper traffic, copyright and fair compensation under scrutiny
Key points
Google's artificial intelligence, the one that responds before the reader has even chosen a link, ends up on the table of the European Commission. Agcom has decided to send Brussels a report on the AI Overviews and AI Mode services offered by Google Ireland, asking for an evaluation in the light of the Digital Services Act. The move is technical, but also political. Because within those synthetic answers that appear at the top of searches a game is being played that concerns newspapers, digital revenues, copyright, and information pluralism.
Publishers' reports
The decision was taken yesterday, at the meeting of 29 April 2026, by the Communications Guarantee Authority. The vote was not unanimous: Commissioner Elisa Giomi was against. The case arose from a report by Fieg, which denounced the effects of the introduction of AI Overviews in Italia.
According to publishers, Google's new functions risk reducing the visibility and findability of journalistic content: fewer clicks to news sites, less advertising revenue, and more difficulties in financing editorial staff and authors. Smaller and independent newspapers in particular would pay the bill.
Node visibility and error risk
Until yesterday, the search engine indexed, sorted and referred to sources. Now, with AI-generated answers, the user can find a summary of the searched content on the Google page. The 'zero position' thus becomes the new locus of information consumption. But if the reader stays there, without entering the sites, the relationship between platform and newspapers changes in nature. No longer just traffic distribution, but possible substitution of access to sources.
Fieg also points to a second risk: that the answers of artificial intelligence contain errors, inaccuracies or invented information, 'hallucinations', without immediate tools to verify their origin. If automatic synthesis becomes the prevailing filter, who guarantees transparency, accountability and plurality of sources?



