Media

Google, Agcom takes AI search to the EU Commission

After Fieg complaint, the Authority reports AI Overviews and AI Mode to Brussels: pluralism, newspaper traffic, copyright and fair compensation under scrutiny

by Andrea Biondi

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Google's artificial intelligence, the one that responds before the reader has even chosen a link, ends up on the table of the European Commission. Agcom has decided to send Brussels a report on the AI Overviews and AI Mode services offered by Google Ireland, asking for an evaluation in the light of the Digital Services Act. The move is technical, but also political. Because within those synthetic answers that appear at the top of searches a game is being played that concerns newspapers, digital revenues, copyright, and information pluralism.

Publishers' reports

The decision was taken yesterday, at the meeting of 29 April 2026, by the Communications Guarantee Authority. The vote was not unanimous: Commissioner Elisa Giomi was against. The case arose from a report by Fieg, which denounced the effects of the introduction of AI Overviews in Italia.

Loading...

According to publishers, Google's new functions risk reducing the visibility and findability of journalistic content: fewer clicks to news sites, less advertising revenue, and more difficulties in financing editorial staff and authors. Smaller and independent newspapers in particular would pay the bill.

Node visibility and error risk

Until yesterday, the search engine indexed, sorted and referred to sources. Now, with AI-generated answers, the user can find a summary of the searched content on the Google page. The 'zero position' thus becomes the new locus of information consumption. But if the reader stays there, without entering the sites, the relationship between platform and newspapers changes in nature. No longer just traffic distribution, but possible substitution of access to sources.

Fieg also points to a second risk: that the answers of artificial intelligence contain errors, inaccuracies or invented information, 'hallucinations', without immediate tools to verify their origin. If automatic synthesis becomes the prevailing filter, who guarantees transparency, accountability and plurality of sources?

The Ball in Brussels

After information and hearings by Google, Fieg and Fisc, Agcom chose not to close the file at home. The request is transmitted to the European Commission on the basis of Article 65 of the Dsa. A choice, this, already adopted by the German Autority.

Brussels will therefore have to assess whether there are grounds for a possible investigation into possible violations of the obligations for very large platforms and search engines. In the crosshairs: Articles 34 and 35, on the mitigation of systemic risks, and Article 27, on the transparency of recommendation systems.

Back in February, Agcom's president, Giacomo Lasorella, had explained: 'We have been asked about the relationship between the press and Google's AI Mode, the German authority has already done so and we are about to make a report to the European Commission, it is a clear case of impact on information'. He added: 'By going to AI Mode, the risk is that we will no longer read newspapers. There is a risk of compression of the freedom of information and the right of citizens to access multiple sources of information enshrined in Article 3 of the European Freedom Act'.

In the complaint filed by Fieg Google was described as a 'traffic killer' through AI Overviews and AI Mode, tools accused of draining web traffic and vital resources to newspapers. Google has long rejected the accusation that it wants to replace the press. Diego Ciulli, Google's Head of Government Affairs and Public Policy in Italia, had defended the new functions as follows: 'AI Overviews and AI Mode are a natural evolution of the search engine, we are improving the previous way of doing research, not access to information'.

A permanent table

The game will not stop at signalling. At the same meeting, the Agcom Council decided to set up a permanent table between Google, other interested platforms and publishers. Subject: copyright, artificial intelligence, protection of pluralism and fair compensation for the online use of editorial content. This is an attempt to open negotiations while Brussels will consider whether to turn on the regulatory lights.

Fieg's satisfaction

Fieg, Federazione Italiana Editori Giornali (Italian Federation of Newspaper Publishers), in a note expressed 'its appreciation for the decision of the Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (the Italian Communications Authority) to forward, in its capacity as Coordinator for digital services for Italia, a report to the European Commission on Google's AI services'.

The initiative, 'which stems from a petition we submitted last October,' comments FIEG president Andrea Riffeser Monti, 'comes at the end of a detailed and in-depth investigation and bears witness to the Authority's attention to the effects of these systems on traffic to publishing sites and, more generally, on the dynamics of the sector.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti