Europe

Google, EU Commission opens proceedings on media content in the search engine

In the event of an infringement, the community body may impose fines of up to 10% of the company's total global turnover

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

There is a thread that binds each new European investigation into Google. A sort of growing, almost palpable tension between Brussels and Mountain View. A friction that this time risks weighing even more heavily, because it moves within the rigid - and politically symbolic - perimeter of the Digital Markets Act, the European law that came into force in 2023 designed to limit the power of the world's largest technology platforms with a series of rules on what to do and what not to do.

The European Commission has just announced the opening of new proceedings against Big G, suspected of unfairly penalising certain search results linked to publishers. In particular, it is behaviour that could violate the DMA: the 'demotion' in rankings when a site hosts content from commercial partners. In the inscrutable language of European regulators, it means one very simple thing: if you publish sponsored material, you risk disappearing further down the rankings on Google. And that, for many publishers today, is the difference between surviving and floundering.

Loading...

"We want to make sure that publishers do not lose revenue at the very worst time for the industry," said Competition Commissioner Teresa Ribera, hinting that there is more at stake than just a technical procedure. The Commission claims that, under the neutral label of 'site reputation abuse policy', Google is actually intervening directly in one of the most widespread - and legitimate - forms of editorial monetisation. In more banal words: the engine that stops being an engine and puts its beak into editorial choices, before providing search results to the user.

Should the investigation result in a conviction, Alphabet (the giant that controls Google) would risk - as per DMA practice - penalties of up to 10% of global turnover. Which in this specific case would be several billion dollars.

For its part, Google is clearly of a different opinion. In a blog post, Pandu Nayak, chief researcher at Google Search, stated that the EU's investigation into what Google calls its anti-spam initiatives is 'completely wrong and risks harming millions of European users'. The company claims that its policy is necessary to prevent third-party paid content on publishers' websites from appearing in search results in higher positions than they deserve.

Matters of wool, in short.

Now, the EU's goal (according to what has been ascertained) is to close the file within a year. but the context is not the most serene. The new investigation, in fact, follows a fine of almost 3 billion euros imposed on Google in September for allegedly favouring its own advertising technology services over those of its competitors, which provoked the ire of US President Donald Trump, who called the fine 'discriminatory'.

Not to mention that September's sanction already followed a fine of EUR 4.13 billion for Android and a fine of EUR 2.42 billion for crushing competitors in product search (it should be noted, however, that a fine of EUR 1.49 billion relating to AdSense was cancelled last year).

In another case, Google was punished earlier this year for allegedly violating the regulation by favouring in-house services in its vast search empire and preventing app developers from directing consumers to offers outside its Play Store, charges for which it has been trying to find a solution, while the threat of further fines looms.

Certainly, Google's search engine is in the crosshairs again. And it is not a trivial moment. Because in the meantime, the first AI-based engines have arrived on the market (such as Atlas, by OpenAI), which could redraw the balance of a very flourishing market.

Here too, however, the vigilance of the regulators will be high. AI-based engines, in fact, are born with the assumption of providing answers without landing users on sites. In other words: those who produce content risk oblivion. An eventuality that would break the Internet pact. A story we will be talking about for a long time to come.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti