From governance to delays and costs: the Court of Auditors' spotlight on the F35 programme
Resolution No. 5 of 26 March 2926 of the Control Section for European and International Affairs: 'Italy's status as a mere partner in the F35 programme, whose leadership is solely in the hands of the USA produced no sharing of the technologies developed'
by Andrea Carli
Key points
- The governance node: partners cannot influence decisions
- Delays and cost consequences
- Shared spending and the effects of the US no to Turkey
- How Italy's aircraft procurement strategy is changing
- Schedule costs again
- "Marginal technological return for the Cameri Trivalent Pole"
- The employment impact of the order review
The issue of defence spending is at the centre of an all-political tug-of-war within the government. In the last few hours, a passage in amajority motion has first entered and then exited, calling for a reconsideration of the NATO commitment to increase spending to 5% of GDP.
Then there is the match between Defence Minister Guido Crosetto on one side and Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti on the other on the issue of Italy's recourse to the resources put on the table by the European Commission under the Safe Fund. In a letter sent to Ursula von del Leyen, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni demanded that the exemption from the Stability Pact provided for defence also be extended to expenditure for the energy crisis or, she hinted, Italy's activation of the EU programme is at risk. There are 14.9 billion allocated to Italia.
With regard to defence expenditure, the Court of Auditors recently returned to put the management of the F35 international defence programme under the lens. The resolution n.5 of 26 March 2926 of the control section for European and international affairs "in terms of aggregate public expenditure", "notes the specific incidence of the F35 programme on investment expenditure in the sector equal to 17.5% (EUR 786 million per year), to which must be added the burden of the Gcap programme (EUR 2 billion spent until 2025)". The Gcap is the programme involving Italia, the UK and Japan for the production of the sixth-generation fighter. The aircraft is expected to enter service by 2035.
"As of June 2025," the document goes on to say, "€11.84 billion had been spent on the F35 programme (for the development and production phases, for the Cameri trivalent plant and for site commissioning) and €2 billion on the Gcap programme."
The governance node: partners cannot influence decisions
Under the lens of the accounting judges, who, as the Analysis Defence portal also reports, intervenes on the issue for the sixth time in fourteen years, ends up with the governance of the programme. "Italia's status as a mere partner in the F35 programme, whose leadership is in the hands of the US alone," reads the document, "has resulted in an absence of sharing of the technologies developed, unbalanced growth of the know-how acquired between the leading country and its partners, a lack of transparency on the cost processes inherent in project activities, and an absence of effective sharing of intellectual properties. "Since the governance of the programme is under the control of the US," the accounting judiciary further observed, "it follows that it is impossible for the partners, regardless of the level of transparency of the cost procedures, to be able to influence the decision-making dynamics, especially on the shared cost components."

