Defence

From governance to delays and costs: the Court of Auditors' spotlight on the F35 programme

Resolution No. 5 of 26 March 2926 of the Control Section for European and International Affairs: 'Italy's status as a mere partner in the F35 programme, whose leadership is solely in the hands of the USA produced no sharing of the technologies developed'

by Andrea Carli

Crosetto "Saranno addestrati in Sicilia i piloti degli F-35"

5' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

5' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The issue of defence spending is at the centre of an all-political tug-of-war within the government. In the last few hours, a passage in amajority motion has first entered and then exited, calling for a reconsideration of the NATO commitment to increase spending to 5% of GDP.

Then there is the match between Defence Minister Guido Crosetto on one side and Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti on the other on the issue of Italy's recourse to the resources put on the table by the European Commission under the Safe Fund. In a letter sent to Ursula von del Leyen, Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni demanded that the exemption from the Stability Pact provided for defence also be extended to expenditure for the energy crisis or, she hinted, Italy's activation of the EU programme is at risk. There are 14.9 billion allocated to Italia.

Loading...

With regard to defence expenditure, the Court of Auditors recently returned to put the management of the F35 international defence programme under the lens. The resolution n.5 of 26 March 2926 of the control section for European and international affairs "in terms of aggregate public expenditure", "notes the specific incidence of the F35 programme on investment expenditure in the sector equal to 17.5% (EUR 786 million per year), to which must be added the burden of the Gcap programme (EUR 2 billion spent until 2025)". The Gcap is the programme involving Italia, the UK and Japan for the production of the sixth-generation fighter. The aircraft is expected to enter service by 2035.

"As of June 2025," the document goes on to say, "€11.84 billion had been spent on the F35 programme (for the development and production phases, for the Cameri trivalent plant and for site commissioning) and €2 billion on the Gcap programme."

The governance node: partners cannot influence decisions

Under the lens of the accounting judges, who, as the Analysis Defence portal also reports, intervenes on the issue for the sixth time in fourteen years, ends up with the governance of the programme. "Italia's status as a mere partner in the F35 programme, whose leadership is in the hands of the US alone," reads the document, "has resulted in an absence of sharing of the technologies developed, unbalanced growth of the know-how acquired between the leading country and its partners, a lack of transparency on the cost processes inherent in project activities, and an absence of effective sharing of intellectual properties. "Since the governance of the programme is under the control of the US," the accounting judiciary further observed, "it follows that it is impossible for the partners, regardless of the level of transparency of the cost procedures, to be able to influence the decision-making dynamics, especially on the shared cost components."

The delays and cost consequences

The document also dwells on the time factor. "It has suffered significant delays, especially in its experimental phase," the Court of Auditors recalls, "since it should have ended in 2012 and, instead, ended in 2023, causing a considerable delay also in the subsequent phases. In particular, the transition to full production of the aircraft did not take place until 2024, instead of 2015, with an economic-financial impact, leading to increased costs that were reflected on the leading country, but also on its partners."

Shared spending and the effects of the US no to Turkey

With reference to the shared cost forecasts (shared, ed.), "the unilateral decision by the US to exclude Turkey has led to an increase in the cost forecasts, as a new ceiling has been introduced for non-recurring shared programme costs, with a new financial commitment by Italia of $2,233.7 million for the period 2021-2051. Consequently, the amount is to be added to the contribution already paid, $602.15 million (compared to the estimated share of $603.64), for $2,835.85 million."

How does Italia's strategy change in terms of aircraft procurement

?

Then there is a problem concerning Italia's choices on the F35 purchase plan. "On the contrary," the document goes on to say, "the government's 2014 decision to reduce the purchase of the aircraft from 131 to 90, although it has led to a reduction in future shared costs, has not produced a proportional reduction in the charges already incurred. In addition, the negative economic effect reflected by the reduction in aircraft production for Italia mainly concerned the Italian industrial production of wing assemblies, which was significantly reduced (from 1,215 to 835), with a decrease in the forecast of employment volumes (from 10,000 to an estimated 3,500 to 6,400). However,' underlines the accounting judiciary, 'the current programmatic document of the Ministry of Defence has provided for the acquisition of 115 aircraft, modifying, again, the previous decision'.

Towards a new rise in programme costs

"This,' reads the conclusions of the resolution, 'while mitigating the negative economic effects, as outlined above, resulting from the original reduction in the acquisition plan (from 131 to 90), it will also lead to a new increase in programme costs. Due to the need to introduce new technologies and in consideration of the inflationary trend, a further increase in shared costs has been estimated, which would exceed the financial limit finally set on a contractual basis between the US and the partners, by USD 17,220 million. The direct impact for Italia would be 440.27 million, reaching the maximum expected contribution of 3,276.12 million. Hence, an exponential growth of the programme's cost estimates in its shared cost component, with an impact also on Italia - whose estimated contribution has gone from USD 904 million to USD 2,835.85 (already agreed upon on a contractual basis) - to a further hypothetical increase (yet to be authorised) of USD 3,276.12 million. This cost component, in forecast terms, has more than tripled, without considering the subsequent update (not yet agreed) that revises the estimate upwards. The increase in the shared component," the accounting judges continue, "in addition to an increased disbursement on the initial forecasts (for example, compared to the budgeted amount of $904 million for this component as at 30 June 2025, $901 million has already been spent), reflects the impossibility of affecting the decision-making processes related to this area."

"Marginal technological return for the Cameri Trivalent Pole"

Finally, a passage of the document is on the industrial and technological return of the Trivalent Pole of Cameri. "It was built," the accounting magistrates recall, "with the aim of producing wing assemblies, assembling aircraft, maintaining and updating them. The establishment of the plant generated (June 2025) a cost of EUR 1.31 billion, while industrial participation in the F35 programme reached a contractual volume of USD 7.4 billion. The figure is $2.25 billion lower than the initial estimate (-23%), due to the negative financial and economic impact of the downsizing of the national fleet from 131 to 90 aircraft. The economic values are positive, in perspective, considering that, as stated by the Ministry of Defence, the Pole is a reference point for the Euro-Mediterranean area for the F35 fleet'. On the other hand, with regard to the 'technological return connected to the Pole', the Court of Auditors notes 'the marginality of the same with respect to the programme in its entirety, considering that the production of wing assemblies, and the assembly and maintenance of the aircraft relate more to avionics-mechanics skills than to the technological advancement typical of this avionics sector (radar, sensors, etc.)'.

The employment impact of the order review

Finally, the Court of Auditors clarifies that "the reduction of the acquisition plan (from 131 to 90 aircraft) has led to a downsizing of the estimates of employment volumes, which stand at between 3,500 and 6,400 positions. The actual employment (2024) is 3,861, in line with the range of the estimate; most of the employees work within Leonardo and of these more than half at the Pole."

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti