Towards the Manoeuvre

The government's plans: Irpef cuts for 13.6 million people and simpler Ires premiums

Deputy Minister Leo: 'Priority to reduce middle class taxes, up to EUR 60,000 if resources are available'. Corporate tax towards calculation with more weight to income than profit

by Gianni Trovati and Giovanni Parente

lucadp - stock.adobe.com

4' min read

4' min read

The tax yard of the manoeuvre is entering into full swing. Technical meetings are taking place at the Ministry of the Economy, and a few papers are beginning to end up on the table: while waiting for the framework of the available financial spaces to take full shape.

The Irpef reduction

.

Explicitly highlighting the executive's ambitions was the deputy minister of the Economy, Maurizio Leo, during yesterday's Telefisco 2025 Special. In his speech, Leo explicitly relaunched his ambition to broaden the scope of the new Irpef discounts with a twofold move: the reduction by two points from 35% to 33% of the second rate and the enlargement up to 60 thousand euro of annual gross income of the bracket that today stops at 50 thousand euro. With a 'one-two punch' that in the deputy minister's calculations could benefit 13.6 million taxpayers. For companies, on the other hand, the plan that the government is outlining focuses on the Ires bonus, not only with the structural transformation of the incentive, currently experimented only for this year, but also with a review to simplify its features and align its calculation on income.

Loading...

Certainties are still far away and, as is customary, Leo insisted again yesterday, 'at the risk of sounding monotonous', on the need to 'find the resources first', specifying that the challenge is 'very complex'. On this terrain, the date to be circled in red is that of Monday 22 September, when ISTAT will publish the new edition of the annual economic accounts: among the variables at stake, once again, is the usual Superbonus, because the new figures from the statistics institute will reveal the use of tax credits in 2024 and its consequences on the debt of that year and the following ones.

The political debate

.

In any case, Leo's words animate the political discussion and not only. From the president of Forza Italia senators Maurizio Gasparri comes an appreciation that sounds at the same time like a vindication: "Leo's opening on Forza Italia's proposal on the Irpef cut is good," he says. And Economy Undersecretary Sandra Savino, also from Fi, added: "Lowering taxes has always been a Forza Italia priority and today it is at the centre of the government's work". tax relief on the middle class and the implementation of the premium IRES are also priorities for commercialists, as pointed out by president Elbano de Nuccio.

The effects on taxpayers

.

The real effects of the manoeuvre on the pockets of Irpef taxpayers will derive from two factors. The first is the actual possibility of raising the new 33% tax rate up to 60 thousand euro of income, without stopping instead at 50 thousand as the lighter hypothesis envisages. Route number one would require about 5 billion per year according to the most up-to-date calculations, while option B would require just under 3 billion. However, the final accounts could also be affected, and this is the second factor, by a possible new intervention on deductions, along the lines of what happened in 2024 for incomes over 50,000 euro (flat-rate cut of 240 euro to sterilise the effect of the three-rate reduction), or with a remodulation of the ceiling on deductible expenses introduced by the 2025 manoeuvre over 75,000 euro of income and according to the number of family members.

Net of all this, a 33% tax rate up to 60 thousand euro would split the taxpayers in two. For the more than 9 million taxpayers who today declare between 28 and 50 thousand euro the Irpef cut would oscillate between 40 and 440 euro per year. Much stronger would be the impact for the 940,000 Italians who have an income between between 50 and 60 thousand euro and who would have their tax rate reduced by 10 points from the current 43 per cent. In this case, the cut would be worth up to EUR 1,640 per year, or a little less than EUR 137 per month. And the same effect would be replicated for the 2.1 million tax return holders with incomes above 60,000 euro per year: precisely for this reason it is possible, as mentioned, that a compensatory mechanism will be decided, also to avoid devoting resources to discounts for higher incomes.

In fact, the Government's declared intention is to focus on the 'middle class'; and its most important practical effect would be to return, at least in part, a portion of the fiscal drag inflated by the inflation of recent years (more than 23 billion of increased revenue according to estimates based on UPB calculations), particularly to that segment of taxpayers who, declaring more than 40 thousand euro per year, could not benefit from the cut in the contribution wedge transformed into a tax key by the last manoeuvre; and who, in the last few years, have been unable to benefit from the cut in the contribution wedge transformed into a tax key. in particular to that slice of taxpayers who, declaring more than 40,000 euro per year, could not enjoy the cut in the contribution wedge transformed into a tax wedge by the last manoeuvre; and who, from 50,000 euro upwards, enjoy the questionable privilege of sharing the same marginal rate with millionaires.

Ires premium for enterprises

The other pillar of the government's tax-cutting plan concerns businesses. On the menu, but always compatible with resources, is the attempt to stabilise and make less easy the calculation of the bonus IRES, the rate reduction from 24% to 20% for companies that invest and hire. For now, the measure is limited to 2025.

As Leo explained, 'the rate reduction is linked to an income aspect, whereas investment must involve profit allocation, and then 30% of this allocated profit must be allocated to investment. So we see an asymmetry between what is the discipline of reducing taxation and what is the type of investment, one thing is income and one thing is profit'. Therefore, the deputy minister added, 'the goal is precisely to align these two components, i.e. income on income and not income on profit' in the wake of what the tax delegation envisages. The margins for intervention are there to make improvements as well as 'to verify a little bit some preconditions that pertain for example to employees, to the redundancy fund'.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti