The protest

Hunting decree, environmental associations ask Mattarella to block the measure

The WWF and other environmental associations asked the President of the Republic to block the parliamentary process of the bill. However, the government has announced that the work will go ahead

by Pietro Menzani

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The controversy over the hunting decree does not stop. WWF Italia, the National Animal Protection Organisation (Enpa), the League for the Abolition of Hunting (Lac), the Anti-Vivisection League (Lav) and the Italian League for the Protection of Birds (Lipu) have written to the President of the Republic Sergio Mattarella to request the suspension of discussion of the bill and the definitive withdrawal of the text. The process of examining the measure in the combined Environment and Industry commissions of the Senate has now come to an end and the bill could reach the Chamber of Deputies shortly.

The associations' protest

Behind the initiative of the environmental acronyms is an official letter that the European Commission sent to the government last December to report violations of the Birds and Habitats directives contained in the text. The directives referred to in the communication - adopted in 1979 and 1992 respectively - protect the species of wild birds found on EU territory and promote the conservation of Europe's natural heritage.

Loading...

The associations accuse the executive of not having made public the letter that, according to the Wwf, rejects some fundamental parts of the decree, highlighting critical points such as, for example, the extension of hunting out of season and the weakening of the scientific opinion of the Higher Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (Ispra).

Crimini contro la natura, il WWF lancia la campagna di Natale

The appeal to the President of the Republic

The associations have therefore asked the President of the Republic to intervene to protect the Constitution and European legality, since 'going ahead by force means taking the responsibility of approving a law knowing that it violates European law and exposes Italia to infringement procedures with consequent sanctions that all Italians will be forced to pay'.

In fact, the accusation levelled at the Senate commissions in charge of examining the measure is that they ignored the EU's warning and proceeded with the parliamentary procedure, rejecting all the amendments tabled by the oppositions, which, according to the environmentalist unions, could have corrected, at least in part, the critical points raised.

The Government's response

The government's attitude towards the protests of the opposition and associations, however, remains closed. On 14 May, during a question time in the Senate, the Minister of Agriculture, Francesco Lollobrigida, announced that 'we do not intend to interrupt the legislative or government work because of a letter from a bureaucrat'. Lollobrigida reiterated that the hunting, 'however much one may want it or not want it, share it or not share it', is a legal activity and that the bill's process will go ahead.

The head of Masaf also specified that 'the conversion of hunting farms into agri-tourism farms will by no means be automatic, but authorised by the regions at the end of an administrative procedure that requires compliance with particularly strict conditions. Italy's regulatory system provides that those who commit a crime are considered criminals, not those who carry out an activity provided for by law, but if anything those who intend to prevent it by violating it. This also applies to hunting activity'

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti