Hunting, the reform presented in the C.D.M.: longer calendars and the creation of hunting companies
The law aims to regulate hunting activities on the basis of a wildlife scenario that has changed profoundly in recent years, and is certainly completely different from the early 1990s when Law 157 was passed.
4' min read
4' min read
Agriculture Minister Lollobrigida has submitted to the Council of Ministers the text amending law 157/92 on the 'protection of wildlife and hunting', also known as the hunting law. This morning, in fact, the majority group leaders (Malan for Fdi, Romeo for the League, Gasparri for Forza Italia and the deputy leader of the mixed group Salvitti) deposited the text in the Senate to update a law that is now outdated and does not guarantee efficient land management.
Despite the many accusations that have come from environmental and animal rights associations in recent weeks that the government is aiming to liberalise hunting, which poses a serious threat to wildlife, a legislative initiative is instead being pursued that aims to regulate hunting activities on the basis of a wildlife scenario that has changed profoundly in recent years, and is certainly completely different from the early 1990s when Law 157 was passed.
The outsized proliferation of wildlife in many Italian regions is at the root of serious economic damage to Italian farms (in recent weeks alone, crop destructions in wine and fruit and vegetable farms by fallow deer, roe deer and wild boar have been reported), it is responsible for a sharp increase in road accidents involving wild animals and is at the root of the spread (through the vehicle of the wild boar population) of African Swine Fever, a disease that is not transmissible to humans but which can cause very serious economic damage to pig farms estimated at around 2 billion for the entire Italian charcuterie industry should foreign countries block exports.
"Whoever governs," explained the Minister of Agriculture and Food Sovereignty, Francesco Lollobrigida, in the Cdm, "has the duty and the burden of responding to the needs of the nation. We started from an act of the Senate that formally committed the government in the last legislature, and from other acts of this legislature that emphasise the need for intervention, to resolve what is defined as a true 'emergency situation'. The nature of the law dictates that it should be dealt with by Parliament, giving all stakeholders the opportunity to represent their views and positions. The basic text is a balanced text that provides a basis for work on 157/92 that can no longer be postponed. If there is a difference between this Government's way of doing politics and the previous ones, it is that if Parliament gives a direction by a very large majority, including the political forces that are currently in opposition, the Executive acts accordingly as it is its duty to do'.
The text deposited by the group leaders starts from the report on the Senate act (which committed the government) on the damage caused to agriculture by wildlife. The report was approved without any votes against, not even by the forces that are now in opposition.



