AI in the service of health, the crux of the rules
At the Cini Foundation in Venice, the event discussed the risks and potential of new technologies, between ethics and legislation
by Barbara Ganz
3' min read
3' min read
Is there too much or too little artificial intelligence applied to the field of human health? What are the risks of its use and how can they be prevented? In Venice, the Cini Foundation hosted a symposium on the Island of San Giorgio Maggiore with forty world experts on ethics and global health to accelerate the safe and equitable development of artificial intelligence.
The Global Health in the Age of AI. Charting a Course for Ethical implementation and Societal benefit, an international event under the scientific direction of Luciano Floridi, professor and director of the Digital Ethics Center at Yale University and full professor at the Department of Legal Studies at the University of Bologna, addressed the most pressing issues: can the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare increase social inequalities in access to care? Why are people reluctant to trust artificial intelligence when it comes to health? How can data from social media, mobile phones, street and satellite images be used to improve public health and guide government decisions? What are the technical, legal and ethical obstacles? When moving from theoretical models to real patient care in hospitals, what are the concrete possibilities of applying AI? And why can different development rules in different countries create harm instead of benefit?
"The most worrying aspect of artificial intelligence is that it can exacerbate existing structural inequalities in health and global health," warned Amalia Fiske, Technical University of Munich.
The challenges
.'We need to look at different types of challenges,' explains Floridi. 'Firstly, the misuse of AI for discriminatory reasons, for example, perhaps by developing models in countries where there is no adequate legislation and importing valid solutions, but developed in unacceptable contexts. Secondly, we must beware of overuse of new technologies: sometimes huge investments absorb significant costs but do not produce a real benefit, to the detriment of resources that could have been more usefully employed elsewhere'.
Much less studied is the possibility, equally present, of underutilisation of AI: 'There are already diagnoses and treatments that could be improved, thanks to technology that we are late in acquiring. Just think of the timely analysis of X-rays and other images, but also of therapies for epilepsy, for example. What is lacking is a certain regulatory framework'. The ethical and deontological, legal and moral aspects, in short, remain to be defined.







