Cross-border divorces

International couples, in the EU 140,000 divorces per year

Divorce or legal separation pronounced in one EU country is automatically recognised in the other member states

by Marina Castellaneta

3' min read

3' min read

Transnational families on the rise throughout Europe and, at the same time, more and more cases of cross-border divorces. Eurostat also certifies this, pointing out that since 1964, the marriage rate in the European Union has fallen from 8% per 1,000 people to 3.2 in 2020 (with Slovenia, Italy and Portugal having the lowest rate), while the divorce rate has more than doubled, falling only in the last decade.

In any case, there are more than 140,000 international couples who divorce each year in the EU area and, to remove obstacles and limit costs in these situations that can make free movement more difficult, the European Union has intervened with Regulation No. 1259/2010 on the implementation of enhanced cooperation in the area of the law applicable to divorce and legal separation ('Rome III'), in force since 21 June 2012. A key instrument for transnational divorces, together with Regulation No. 2019/1111 (Brussels IIa) and before that Regulation No. 2201/2003 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and in matters of parental responsibility.

Loading...

The Common Frame

.

States have very different rules for legal separation and divorce, and with Regulation No 1259/2010 a common framework at least for private international law provisions was given to allow international couples to designate in advance the law to be applied to divorce and legal separation. With these rules, in fact, in cases where two spouses have different nationalities or live in two different countries, it will be possible to identify the law governing transnational divorce.

The regulation is applicable to 17 states, i.e. the member states that have decided to participate in enhanced cooperation in this area. They are Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, Romania, Spain, Slovenia.

The main connecting factor is that of the will: the spouses may choose the law to be applied, including the law of the EU States not bound by the regulation and non-EU States. In practice, the spouses will be able to designate the law of the State of residence at the time of the conclusion of the agreement; the law of the last residence provided that at least one of them still resides there; the law of the State of nationality of one of the spouses at the time of the conclusion of the agreement; or the law of the forum. To ensure compliance with the informed choice, the agreement must be in writing and signed by both parties, although states have the green light to identify additional formal requirements.

The laws applicable if there is no agreement

.

In case the spouses fail to reach an agreement, the law of the State of the habitual residence of the parties will apply at the time a court is seised. With a guarantee in terms of effectiveness because the law with which the spouses have effective contact will be applied. Other connecting factors follow.

If the law referred to does not provide for divorce (this was the case in Malta before the legislative changes that introduced it) or does not guarantee equal treatment for access to divorce or separation, the law of the forum will apply directly.

Automatic recognition

.

Also guaranteed in the EU area is the circulation of measures with the system of automatic recognition: a divorce or legal separation pronouncement made in one EU country is automatically recognised in the other member states.

There are still differences in national laws in determining the conditions for obtaining a divorce, the grounds, the legal effects also of legal separation, and the use of out-of-court procedures. France, for instance, also to speed up time and not to clog up the courts, has introduced the extra-judicial divorce with a deed filed by a notary.

The European Union has also developed a site where it has collected the conditions and modalities for separation and divorce in the 27 Member States, available at e-justice.europa.eu.

Increasingly central, then, is the Court of Justice, which has intervened on several occasions to clarify certain notions, such as habitual residence. Moreover, in its ruling of 20 December 2017 (C-372/16), it clarified that a unilateral declaration of divorce made by a religious court of a third State does not fall within the notion of divorce under Regulation No. 2201/2003, with the consequence that such pronouncements are excluded from the scope of application of the European conflict-of-law rules.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti