Inventing meaningless penalties. The strange revolution of referees at the time of Var
5' min read
5' min read
Before talking about Inter's slightly overdone victory over Sassuolo (2-1), Juve's slowdown with Verona, and Milan's roar as they rip Udinese to shreds, it is de rigueur to talk about penalties because if to err is human, to persevere in error becomes ridiculous. And to ridicule, as the wise men teach us, there is no remedy.
The curious thing is that all this is happening in the days of Var, thus with a tool that should put referees in the best position to make sensible decisions. Awarding a penalty, in fact, is not an irrelevant decision. Yet things continue to happen that we humans struggle to understand.
In this round, for example, penalties were awarded that not even at five-a-side football on Tuesdays. The most surreal one was awarded by referee Collu to Bologna in the final game against Genoa. In a scrum, after a rebound, the ball touched Carboni's arm. A touch of no significance, impossible to avoid because the ball caroms onto him too closely. To avoid it, Carboni should have turned into a penguin, or had his arms tied to his back like a prisoner.
Yet, summoned by Var, Mr Collu decided to award a penalty to Bologna, which Orsolini converted, bringing the score to 2-1. "Carboni made an extra movement" thunders referee Collu urbi et orbi, leaving an important existential doubt hanging in the air: but what is an 'extra movement'?
Another pearl, rightly contested by Tudor, in Verona-Juventus (1-1,) was that of referee Rapuano who punished a harmless hand contact by Joao Mario on a loose ball. Again, the trajectory was completely unexpected and Joao Mario's arm almost adhered to the body. Yet, after the Var, Mr Rapuano has not the slightest doubt: penalty. Why these absurd penalties? Why distort a simple game with meaningless rules?



