AI in the Iran war, Anthropic sues the Pentagon
After disagreements over the use of Claude in the war in Iran, the matter ends up in court
It could only end like this. With a lawsuit. The affair between Anthropic and the Pentagon, which has filled the headlines in recent days after the Californian company's decision to terminate an existing contract for ethical reasons (the use of its AI in the Iran war), will be the subject of legal contention. The technology company has filed a lawsuit against the US Department of Defence (which Donald Trump has renamed Department of War) to block a decision that places it on a national security risk list in the supply chain. The lawsuit was filed in a federal court in California and asks a judge to overturn the designation and prevent federal agencies from enforcing it.
The Pentagon had announced the measure last Thursday, claiming that the company represented a risk in the technology supply chain. A kind of revenge, after the turnaround led by the CEO, Dario Amodei.
It is worth mentioning that, according to various sources, some of Anthropic's instruments were used in military operations in Iran, even after the company had decided to terminate its collaboration with the Pentagon.
In its appeal filed in court, the Market Street (San Francisco) based company claims that the DOD decision is unlawful and violates its constitutional rights to free speech and due process. The company claims that the government cannot use its power to punish a company for its public positions.
Because in fact, the one against Anthropic looks like a punishment. A punishment signed by the Secretary of Defence, Pete Hegseth, who reacted fiercely to Amodei's choice to remove certain restrictions on the AI models given to the Pentagon. In particular, Antropic wanted to place limits on the use of its systems for the development of fully autonomous weapons and for domestic surveillance programmes in the United States. Or at least that was the official version that came from Market Street.


