Conference in the Senate

Italian Armed Forces leadership to Europe: 'Global instability is a reality, now we need a common defence'

From Figliuolo to Goretti, a clear message came through: European military capabilities must be developed

La Russa: Investire in difesa significa investire in libertà

5' min read

5' min read

The Italian military leaders are sounding the alarm: the challenges to Europe's security, not least those represented by Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the escalation between Israel and Iran in recent hours, confront the EU with the need to field a truly European defence. And to do so quickly. We are already behind schedule: the heightened global instability is a dramatic reality. But Europe, who has the last word in political choices, does not move, does not decide.

The opportunity to convey this message to politics was provided by the conference on common European defence organised by the Italiaprotagonista Foundation of senator and Forza Italia group leader in the Senate Maurizio Gasparri entitled 'European defence, our future'. The meeting, which took place in the Sala Kock of Palazzo Madama on Monday 15 April (with a welcome address by Senate President Ignazio La Russa), was attended by the very front lines of the Italian armed forces: Admiral Giuseppe Berutti Bergotto, Sub-Chief of Staff of the Navy; General Teo Luzi, General Commander of the Carabinieri; General Carmine Masiello, Chief of Staff of the Army; General Francesco Paolo Figliuolo, Interforce Summit Operations Commander; General Luca Goretti, Chief of Staff of the Air Force; and Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone , Chief of the Defence Staff. The threat is real, and present. 'A new Iron Curtain is descending on Europe,' said Berutti Bergotto.

Loading...

Sonuolo: 'At the European level we have been debating common security for seven decades...'

The speech by General Francesco Paolo Figliuolo, Interforce Summit Operations Commander, started from a premise: 'At the European level, we have been debating common security for seven decades,' he recalled. 'The EU has become a large economic entity. Economic integration should have brought with it political integration, starting with the issues that most directly affect national interests. Defence is among them'. This has not happened. Not least because "a European defence requires common strategic objectives. European defence also means sharing the economic budget and industrial know-how. Although,' Figliuolo added, 'we must be in line with the times: economic resources are not enough to have capabilities; capabilities are built over time. Employment procedures and human resources must be prepared'. Hence the conclusion of the argument. Figliuolo resorts to a phrase by Luigi Einaudi: today 'the problem is between existing united or disappearing'.

Luzi: 'Without a European foreign policy there can be no common defence policy'

"I ask myself: what is the EU's policy on foreign issues?" asked General Teo Luzi, Commander General of the Carabinieri Corps. 'There is no common European policy, and without a common foreign policy there can be no European defence policy'. Luzi emphasised procurement: 'Today,' he said, '89 per cent of armaments are produced by individual states, for themselves. Certainly the figure of a European Defence Commissioner is a step forward, but not decisive'. To emphasise how European choices often hang by a thread, Luzi brought the example of the 'European Gendarmerie': for 18 years,' he explained, 'there has been a European command ready to be deployed in Vicenza: it is a common house of seven military-ordered police forces. It can operate in low-intensity missions abroad'. The request comes from international organisations (EU, NATO, UN, OSCE), subject to the green light from the states concerned. In addition to the Carabinieri, the French National Gendarmerie, the Spanish Guardia Civil, the Portuguese Guardia National Repubblicana, the Dutch Marecausussèe and the Romanian Jandarmeria are part of this team. 'Well,' Luzi recalled, 'in 18 years, this solution has never been activated...'.

Dragon: 'The EU must demonstrate cohesion and unity of purpose'

"I agree with the need to gradually develop European military capabilities, deployable under European aegis, complementary to NATO and capable of being effectively deployed where Community interests require it," Cavo Dragone emphasised in his speech. "International peace and stability has a global reach, and Europe must necessarily play a key role in this context," he added. Among the issues Cavo Dragone emphasised was 'the arc of instability that threatens energy supplies. If a gap is left, Russia and China are ready to fill it. Our commitment to international stability is bound to increase'. That is why 'European capabilities complementary to NATO must be developed. To deal with threats we need ready armed forces, properly trained. We need to share our resources,' he continued. 'We need an ad hoc Commissioner for European defence, who will deal with this matter exclusively. 'This is a complex path, extended over time,' stressed the Chief of Defence Staff. The EU must demonstrate cohesion and unity of purpose'.

Masiello: 'There are countries that trust neither NATO nor the EU'

.

General Carmine Masiello, Chief of Staff of the Army, emphasised that 'the strategic approach lacks European indications: I have heard that the European Aspides mission (the one recently approved against the Houthi threat in the Red Sea, ed.) started immediately... perhaps by the standards of the European Union, not those of the Atlantic Alliance. There is an industrial problem,' Masiello continued, 'there is a great difficulty in the common budget of the 27. European countries must join forces to buy weapons systems. The problem is that first we must all decide to move in the same direction: 'There are countries that do not trust either NATO or the EU,' the general recalled in his speech: Finland, Sweden and Denmark have concluded bilateral defence agreements with the United States. We military,' he emphasised, 'are open to cooperation and collaboration with other European armies'. It is therefore up to politics to move, is the message. "Why is there no European warfare training school for European officers?" the Army Chief of Staff asked. "There are the nascent domains," he then recalled, "cyber cannot be touched, but space can: no European country is in a cradle to grave in this sector with the other players, from the US to China. Why doesn't a European space force emerge'.

Goretti: 'I need to understand if there is the political will to arrive at a European defence'

.

'There is a lack of European identity today. I need to understand whether there is the political will to arrive at a European defence,' began Luca Goretti, Chief of Staff of the Air Force. 'The crisis in Ukraine raises the following question: are we able to promote a credible policy, able to show that Europe can move as one? Of course,' said Goretti, 'we do not have the same resources as the US, but we can defend our niche with pride and passion. If the US has capabilities that we do not have, they have an obligation to extend their expertise to us Europeans'. As for the 27, 'as in football, we have to decide who plays goalkeeper, who plays midfielder and who plays striker. If we all want to play in attack...'. Just 'establish the rules of the game well,' he continued, 'the NATO schemes must be applied within the EU. I asked myself: why is this not happening? I was told: "Because history is not forgotten"'. Hence, the Air Force Chief of Staff's conclusion: 'A cultural change is needed. There is a desire on the part of European armed forces leaders to have their own identity. We must have the ability to be able to give up a piece of sovereignty in order to be able to bring something home. If we are credible,' he concluded, 'people will listen to us.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti