Supplementary pension provision

Pension funds, Italians a people of procrastinators

61% are aware that the pension future will be difficult but do not seek alternative solutions. 31% have never thought about a pension fund. Emerging from the Anima-Eumetria survey

by Vitaliano D'Angerio

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

3' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

Italians, a people of procrastinators when it comes to pension funds. This is what emerges from the research 'Italians and supplementary pensions' by Eumetra-Research Dogma commissioned by Anima Sgr: 61% of those interviewed declared that they are aware that the pension future will be difficult but, at the same time, they do not take action to find solutions. And 31% have never thought about some form of supplementary pension provision.

"Complementary pensions today are becoming a necessity for the new generations," emphasised Saverio Perissinotto, CEO and General Manager of Anima, on his first public outing since taking up his new post. "Our children, our grandchildren have few certainties from this point of view, other than having to work longer and having a replacement rate at the pension level of the last salary that will certainly be lower than that had by the current or previous generations.

Loading...

Research and annuity news

The survey was presented duringthe annual workshop organised in Milan by Anima Sgr at the Giorgio Gaber Opera House. 1,022 banked adult Italians were interviewed; responses were taken during the period 23 January-3 February 2026. A survey that comes at a turning point for supplementary pensions, given that the Stability Law has introduced a series of changes for pension funds in particular to incentivise the choice of an annuity at the end of the employment period.

In this regard, 38% of respondents answered that when they retire they would 'be better off' with a lump sum. On the other hand, 21%, in a more Solomonic way, chose the solution of half capital and half annuity. 25% opted for all or part of the annuity while the others did not know what to answer.

What do I do with the severance pay?

Then there is the fateful question about severance pay, the main element for financing one's position in a pension fund. Well, when asked about the destination of the severance pay, 20% replied that they left it in the company, 17% that they allocated it to a pension fund, and 13% explained that they collected it and used it for something else. Then there is a 37% who answer that they do not have the Tfr either because they do not work or because of the type of work they do.

Also worth highlighting are the reasons why 20% of respondents prefer to leave it in the company: 42% explain that 'it is more liquid' and 31% 'because it is safer'. There is a 14% who say they 'didn't know they could invest it'. There is also 8% convinced that 'taxation is more favourable', a statement that is not true given that on severance pay in the company, at the time of receipt, one pays between 30 and 35% tax, unlike the pension fund (15 to 9% depending on the time of joining).

What is the thrust of adhesion?

Finally, what can motivate Italians to join a pension fund? Here there is a difference between respondents with a simple current account (bankers) and those who also make investments (investors). For the former, the reason that would prompt them to subscribe to a pension fund or increase their payments is the lower costs (37%). For investors, on the other hand, in first place (34%) are the higher tax advantages.

The latter is a sign of the difference in pension education among the interviewees. A theme, that of training, which was also discussed at the round table attended by Paolo Pellegrini, deputy director of Mefop, Alberto Brambilla, president of the Itinerari previdenziali study centre and Sergio Corbello, president of Assoprevidenza.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti