Show

Journey Between the Sacred and the Profane in Contemporary Art

The art-religion relationship is investigated in the exhibition, open until 8 February, at the Künstlerhaus in Vienna

Julia Krahn, Vater und Tochter, 2012

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

4' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The art-religion relationship invests the very essence of art-making. This is demonstrated by the anthropological and historical-religious discovery of the ritual and liturgical matrix of the genesis of artistic practices. This is also proven by the history of aesthetic theory, which has been oriented since its beginnings towards the search for a joint definition of the notions of beauty, art and the "divine" - think of Plato, among others - as well as concrete artistic praxis, which for years has coexisted, sometimes in harmonious terms, in other cases in conflictual forms, with religious institutions. How, however, must we ask ourselves, does this original relationship find its declination in an age, such as the modern one, dominated by secularisation and the metamorphosis of the epiphanies of the sacred?

Il sacro e il profano nell’arte contemporanea in mostra a Vienna

Photogallery17 foto

On closer inspection, this question can be reformulated prospectively by taking into account the radical shift that contemporary global society is experiencing. The exhibition project 'Du sollst dir ein Bild machen. Zeitgenössische Kunst und religiöses Erleben' ('You should make yourself a picture. Contemporary art and religious experience'), curated by Günther Oberhollenzer at the Künstlerhaus in Vienna.

Loading...

Between contemporary art and religion

The exhibition, dedicated to the relationship between contemporary art and religion, with a particular focus on Christian iconography, proceeds from a metaphorical reformulation of the iconoclastic prohibition of the Book of Moses (the Second Commandment: "thou shalt not make thyself an idol or an image of any kind") to provocatively reflect on the iconophilic and demiurgic power inscribed in artistic images.

The curatorial project also starts from the assumption that contemporaneity is a phase of multiform transition. In fact, this season is inhabited by artists who are no longer modern, but post-modern; no longer secularised, but post-secular, on the way to rethinking the existential value of religion in the light of a renewed need for the sacred, also through the encounter, at the time of globalisation, with distant religious traditions (Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, etc.) and new spiritual trajectories (the "New Age" universe and the New Religious Movements, etc.).) and new spiritual trajectories (the 'New Age' universe and the New Religious Movements); no longer 'disenchanted' but open to forms of hybridisation between western reason and holistic, symbolic, perspectival, de-centred paradigms.

In the rooms of the exhibition, more than forty artists, some historic and some emerging, who have been able to thematise the relationship between the aesthetic dimension and the religious sphere from a secular but philosophically committed point of view, meet in the exhibition rooms, subdivided by theme. Art, in short, returns to take the spiritual experience seriously. It does so in a stunning, at times chaotic and contradictory multiplicity of perspectives, ranging from respect to rediscovery, from satire to irony, passing through rhizomatic processes of deconstruction, eclecticism and cultural 'pastiche'. To say religion is in fact to allude to transcendence, to the power of the sacred, to the epiphany of meaning, but also to relations of power and oppression, to devices of control and forms of social construction. A dual perspective thus runs through the images evoked in the exhibition: the icon is proclaimed in its archaic sense of sacred image (eikon) but also within the dialectical play with the idea of "iconic" recognisability, the "pop" affirmation of a given model or lifestyle; the cross, an eminent symbol of the Christian faith, also stands out as a transcultural symbol of orientation, connection and axial verticality; the traditional iconography of the triune God and the Virgin Mary are reinterpreted in the light of new, post-metaphysical, inter-religious instances, in some cases even influenced by the debate on identity and gender relations; the Last Supper, finally, emerges in a symbolic guise resulting from the mediation between the testimony of the Holy Scriptures, Leonardo da Vinci's model and contemporary cues.

The Viennese exhibition has the undoubted merit of revealing these plural lines, showing the complexity of the contemporary and the urgency of rethinking the cultural and spiritual legacy of the Christian religion. Brilliant, in this regard, is the IA installation by Philipp Haslbauer, Marco Schmid and Aljosa Smolic, entitled "Deus in Machina": an interactive confessional in which the IA interlocutor takes the form of Jesus, offering the collocutor words of spiritual comfort and sapiential guidance, revealing a learned knowledge of the Holy Scriptures as well as Christian theology. The aut aut aut arises spontaneously: a parody of the relationship with the divine or a new communication channel of a spiritual experience?

Nevertheless, in the writer's opinion, the exhibition project suffers from a selection that privileges minimalist and conceptual perspectives, often oriented towards social examination in the direction of a critical theory of the religious sphere: this is found to act as a cue for polemic, reflection and dialectical trigger, but within categories and expressive tools that are basically too 'profane' to really evoke that sacred to which art was originally related and which, as the historian of religions Mircea Eliade has well explained, requires, in order to be approached, an 'internal' point of view, i.e. a language analogous to that 'tremendous and fascinating mystery' that the sacred itself is, and which no purely discursive thematisation is able to adequately represent. It would then have been nice to perceive within the exhibition, for example, the spiritually open breath of the sacred of an Anselm Kiefer, the dreamlike playfulness of a Yves Klein, the abstract drama of a William Congdon or the mystical tension of a Marc Chagall.

In this perspective, among the most evocative of the works on display are the works of Hermann Nitsch, Drago Persic, Thomas Riess and Aron Demetz: here the sacred - as sublime and perturbing beauty - makes itself present in "luminous images" that, to quote the lyrical prose of Nicolás Gómez Dávila, are "symbols of the possible being that sleeps within us and that our fervent love yearns for". Indeed, 'we are all the promise of something higher'. Beyond kitsch and provocation.

"Du sollst dir ein Bild machen. Zeitgenössische Kunst und religiöses Erleben", ("You should make yourself a picture. Contemporary art and religious experience") curated by Günther Oberhollenzer, Künstlerhaus, Vienna, until 8 February 2026.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti