Against malfeasance

Justice reform, High Court to start disciplinary proceedings

Last year, 80 actions were brought. Out of 90 decisions of the disciplinary section of the Csm, 24 are convictions

by Valentina Maglione

Puwasit Inyavileart - stock.adobe.com

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

2' min read

Translated by AI
Versione italiana

The constitutional reform chooses to separate the self-government of the judiciary from the disciplinary function: while the former remains in the hands of the two higher councils of the judiciary - judiciary and prosecution -, for the latter the proposal is to assign it to the new High Disciplinary Court.

What's Changing

The regulation of the new body is contained in the (rewritten) text of Article 105 of the Constitution. According to this, the High Court will consist of 15 judges, serving for four years.

Loading...

Six will be laici: three will have to be appointed by the President of the Republic from among full professors of universities in legal subjects and lawyers with at least 20 years of practice; and three will be drawn by lot from a list of persons with the same requisites, compiled by the Parliament in joint session within six months of taking office.

The other nine members will be magistrates, six judges and three prosecutors. The reform envisages that they will be drawn by lot from among the members of the respective categories who, however, have at least 20 years of judicial service behind them and who perform or have performed functions of legitimacy.

The president of the High Court will have to be elected from among the lay members. Double jeopardy will be guaranteed: first instance judgments issued by the High Court may be appealed, also on substantive grounds, before the same High Court, which will judge with a different composition.

offences and sanctions

Here too, the reform relies on ordinary law for implementation: in particular, to determine disciplinary offences and sanctions and to regulate the disciplinary procedure and the functioning of the High Court.

It is a system that marks a caesura with respect to the current one. Today, in fact, disciplinary action can be brought by the Attorney General of the Supreme Court or by the Minister of Justice, and it is the disciplinary section of the SCC that decides. According to the latest data released with the report of the Attorney General of the Supreme Court for the inauguration of the judicial year, in 2024 80 disciplinary actions were proposed, of which 27 by the Minister and 53 by the Attorney General. The decisions of the disciplinary section of the SCC were 90: 24 proceedings ended with the conviction of the magistrate, 28 with acquittal and the remaining with measures of not proceeding or not to proceed.

Copyright reserved ©
Loading...

Brand connect

Loading...

Newsletter

Notizie e approfondimenti sugli avvenimenti politici, economici e finanziari.

Iscriviti